Jim,
In early experiments
we obtained some measurements that indicated slightly weakened magnets,
so we included that in the patent application. However, later we found
we had a difficult-to-find instrumentation problem (defective transistor
in one instrument), and repaired it. New readings with correct
instruments then showed no deterioration of the magnets at all, over
time nor have we seen any since then in any running since then.
Best wishes,
Tom Bearden
Tom:
In
reading through your Patent # US 6,362,718 B1, you comment (on Pg 11)
that "Continued operation of the MEG causes demagnetization of the
permanent magnet.". I would expect this (although some others claim
that there is no demagnetization in similar PM uses) in that the
magnetic fields generated in the output coils would pass, in part at
least, through the PM and could be expected to cause some
demagnetization.
My
question is this: Have you run the MEG at some constant input power for
an extended period of time and measured the total watt-hours of
over-unity energy delivered up to the time that the COP had dropped to
1.0, and then compared this total energy with the energy initially used
to magnetize the PM? I.e., does the PM simply store magnetic energy?
If so, I
would appreciate seeing your figures just to satisfy myself that we are
truly into "energy from the vacuum".
If a PM
does lose magnetism with use, one would expect that the magnets in PM
motors and generators would also become weaker with use. I've never
heard of this happening. (?)
Jim W