Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 11:14 AM
Dear
Bernadette and Jean,
Very much
appreciated, and I thank you for the kind words and good wishes. As you might imagine, we five inventors of the MEG also intensely share the deep frustration! We have worked many years on this device, tinkering and adjusting and very slowly developing and patenting it. It only requires about a year of hard work (and 10 to 12 million dollars) to finish its formal engineering development so that it could be put into mass production. The operation of the MEG is not even describable by standard electrical engineering (more on that in a moment), so the finishing "stabilization and control" work has to be performed by a team of specialists - one in the Aharonov-Bohm effect and geometric phase (both theory and experimental measurement), one in nonlinear oscillation theory and control including chaotic oscillation control and measurement, and a couple in higher group symmetry electrodynamics model development (we have to produce our own fitted highly nonlinear engineering model for the energy from the vacuum operation, since none exists in the literature), etc. We have funded all the work to date ourselves, except for a couple small donations from interested persons (a very good time-sampling oscilloscope with all the probes, e.g.). For the five of us, this effort has consumed the greatest part of our available cash and personal time for more than a dozen years. Ironically, the Aharonov-Bohm effect that we freely apply, is proven and published in some 20,000 papers worldwide in physics. The effect does not exist in electrical power engineering.
The AB
effect, however, allows one to localize all the normal curled magnetic
energy (the B-field energy) and still use it, but also to have additional
A-potential energy appear in the surrounding space from which the normal
B-field was withdrawn. There remains a global connection between the
confined B-field energy and the external free A-potential energy. By
perturbing the confined B-field energy, one also simultaneously perturbs
the external A-field energy, which results in sharp E-fields being
generated (by dA/dt = - E) and radiating back into the MEG, adding excess
free EM energy from the environment. That of course is an operation
analogous to the standard home heat pump, where the environment is tricked
into furnishing excess energy input. Once one has such an energy input
from the environment, then the unit is absolutely permitted to perform COP
>1.0, by approved thermodynamics and the conservation of energy law. The
common home heat pump, e.g., will have perhaps only a 50% overall
efficiency, and it will waste half of all its energy input. However, so
much energy is input by the environment, that the heat pump can still
output three to four times as much energy (work) as the energy input made
by the operator and paid for by him. There is no viable reason whatsoever
that an electrical power system cannot be made to operate in the same
mode. The only reason they do not do so, is that the early pioneers loved
symmetry, so the electrodynamicists insist on using a closed current loop
circuit with the source of free potential energy flow wired into the
circuit as a load to be continually destroyed. That way, the circuit
self-enforces Lorentz symmetry (ah, beauty! As the mathematicians sigh.).
In turn, that allows the use of Lorentz invariant equations to describe
the operation of that system, and those equations are much easier to solve
algebraically, thus avoiding the necessity of using numerical methods for
most applications. However, that also arbitrarily selects only those
Maxwellian systems which exhibit COP
≥
1.0. That way, our inane
scientific community guarantees the underunity COP performance of our
power systems (except for such systems as solar cell array power systems,
hydroelectric power systems, etc. which have COP =
∞ because the operator
inputs none of the energy input at all.). But by insisting on algebraic
solutions and "mathematical beauty", our electrodynamicists have
betrayed us by denying us "heat pump" like systems which output more
energy than the operator must input. That is perfectly permissible, so
long as the external environment inputs the additional energy. But by this
terrible and arbitrary slashing of Maxwellian systems, the power meter
stays on one's home and office, the gas pump meter stays on the gas pump,
and a number of extraordinarily large and powerful energy cartels stay
firmly in business, burning the hydrocarbons, consuming the nuclear fuel
cells, despoiling and poisoning the environment, etc. The Takahashi
magnetic Wankel engine (see my book, Energy from the Vacuum), for example,
can readily be built and made to work by any electrical engineering
department. How many have been so built by our universities, the
Department of Energy, etc.? Not one.
Anyway, we
continue in our negotiations with potential investment groups for the
funding necessary to complete the unit, which in its present form is a
successful laboratory bench experiment device,
not a multi-kilowatt
device already finished and ready to roll off the assembly lines right
now.
We are
still hopeful that we will obtain the funding, and that we can then get on
full-bore with finishing the MEG development, and then with licensing it
for production and mass marketing. Till then, we shall just grit our teeth
and continue to do everything we can.
Note that
we would also have placed on the world market a self-powering Kawai
system, in 1997, but the Japanese Yakuza suppressed it right here in
Huntsville Alabama in 1996, when we had just concluded our agreement with
Kawai himself who was visiting us. Kawai already had a "self-powering"
motor in
Meanwhile,
we are also sharing freely and worldwide the hard-won principles of
energy-from-the-vacuum systems, gained in over 30 years of very hard work,
to put such systems on a proper scientific basis. We are doing everything
we can to focus the attention of the young doctoral candidates and young
post doctoral scientists on these principles, as well as directing them to
the experiments already known in physics which prove the principles. As an
example, the standard "negative resonance absorption of the medium" (NRAM)
area of physics already uses a self-resonant
reaction cross section increasing
process that outputs some 18 times as much usable energy as the Poynting
energy component input by the operator and paid for by him. One of the
frequency ranges in which this NRAM process works is in the infrared -
i.e., for heat. Now envision a practical application, where around a
conventional steam boiler in an electrical power plant an "outer shell"
with the active self-resonant particle medium is built. Suppose the COP
achieved by this subsystem is COP = 10, rather than the ideal COP = 18
already shown and proven in the hard literature. Remember, we are now
heating the outer NRAM shell, not the normal boiler inside. And we can
heat the outer NRAM shell with only 10% as much heat input as was formerly
furnished to the boiler, and the NRAM process will multiply our input, so
that it outputs to the boiler the exact same heat input it always had. We
have easily explained where the excess energy comes from, and what the
mechanism is by which it is freely furnished from a very peculiar portion
of the external environment.
So now you
can heat the same boiler, to the same temperature, etc., and make the same
steam, yet you need furnish and burn only one tenth of the coil or oil or
gas (or use only one tenth of the nuclear fuel rods) that were previously
required. This alone would rather quickly free the electrical power plant
world from the tyranny of
And as an
afterthought, now consider staging multiple stages of such "surrounding
heat amplifiers" around the same boiler(s). Two stages each of COP = 10
would reduce the necessary heat energy input by the operator to
one hundredth of its
normal value! More likely is a decline in efficiency with staging, so
perhaps the second stage would only have COP = 5. Even so, the necessary
heat energy input by the operator is reduced to
one fiftieth of its normal
value. It might be that one could reach the one-hundredth mark by several
stages, even so. This is the kind of thing that could rather readily be
done by our own Department of Energy and the National Science Foundation,
if we had a scientific leadership that had any real comprehension of the
electrical power industry implications and ramifications of NRAM
technology already demonstrated and shown (and experimentally proven in
physics) since 1967. No one seems to know it, and no one seems even
interested in it.
The
terribly powerful Big Nuclear Fusion cartel in science will ruthless
destroy any such attempts to dramatically reduce the dependence on primary
heat energy input, including exactly what it did to destroy cold fusion.
The real principle that enables
cold fusion is long since working in thermodynamics, and it is long since
experimentally demonstrated and proven by the thermodynamicists, without
recognizing its application to cold fusion. The mechanism
is provided by known and measured statistical fluctuation of reactions in
fluids, where under the proper circumstances the reactions in a volume of
up to one cubic micron in size are reversed temporarily, in a negative
entropy operation known, demonstrated, and accepted to violate the second
law of thermodynamics. E.g., in water a cubic micron contains about 30
billion ions or molecules, and in such a statistical fluctuation these can
now have reversed reactions.
It has been experimentally shown that some of these fluctuations can and
do last for up to two seconds. But here's the part that is never
discussed in relation to proof that reactions can be and are reversed:
The only thing preventing cold fusion
in ordinary chemical solutions, is the Coulomb barrier - i.e., the mutual
repulsion of like charges and like ions. By whatever means,
if one can get two D+ ions close enough together so that each enters the
strong force region of the other, then a quasi-nucleus will be formed and
the two will be held together by the strong force.
In
hot fusion where the
reactions are not reversed by novel external factors intervening, the only
way to get this quasi-nucleus formed is to add great energy and momentum
to one (or both) of the D+ ions so that each penetrates to the strong
force region of the other D+ ion before it can be deflected fully aside by
the Coulomb force. If the two ions get close enough together before
deflection aside, then the strong force overcomes the electromagnetic
force and those two ions will indeed form a real nucleus, by nuclear
transformation. Nuclear transformation has nothing to do with any total
requirement for high energy! It has to do with forming those quasi-nuclei,
by whatever means and at whatever energy possible. In any case, once the
strong force overcomes the Coulomb force, some quasi nuclei will be born,
and so one gets transmutation to He4++ ions which are alpha particles.
The entire
hot fusion community seems not to read forefront thermodynamics, and
simply has not recognized or will not accept any simple means of reversing
the common nuclear reactions. The community has no consideration of, or
use for, novel thermodynamic mechanisms already shown to be capable of
reversing the so-called "Coulomb barrier" that is the only thing
preventing cold fusion in the first place.
It does not require high energy to obtain
fusion; it requires high energy to overcome the normal Coulomb barrier so
that fusion can automatically occur once the approaching ions intertwine
in their strong force regions. But how convenient it all
becomes if the Coulomb barrier itself suddenly reverses and becomes the
Coulomb attractor! The entire hot fusion community and the big nuclear
power plant cartel has apoplexy at the mere thought of such a monstrosity,
because it would dramatically reduce or even eliminate the need for all
those big accelerators, billions of dollars, prestigious positions,
prestigious publications, etc. In short, it would displace high energy hot
fusion to a very weak and mild supporting role.
In certain
deuterated nuclear solutions, statistical fluctuations can be augmented
(by certain palladium lattices etc.) so that the reaction-reversing
fluctuation occurs more frequently and for longer periods of time - up to
two seconds. And during one of
those transient fluctuations lasting for up to two seconds, the normal law
of attraction of unlike charges and repulsion of like charges can reverse.
When this happens, the two D+ ions will strongly attract each other, and
many such attracting pairs will result in formation of quasi nuclei. As
the reaction then reverses back to normal (as the fluctuation reverses and
disappears), the quasi nucleus just formed is stable, and so it results in
the formation of excess He4++ ions, which explains the well-known surplus
of alpha particles produced in so many successful cold fusion experiments
(hundreds). This type of information is going to be continually
suppressed, however, by the entourages of both (1) the hot fusion cartel,
and (2) the "big nuclear power plants cartel". The hot fusion cartel is
going to get its "blood money" of many more billions from the
The evil
entourage of that huge nuclear power plant cartel intends to quietly
appropriate that little cold fusion reaction, hide it as something else,
and use it. But the cartel must simultaneously and ruthlessly suppress
cold fusion to prevent the cat of "simple reaction reversal by augmented
statistical fluctuations" from getting out of the bag and obsolete their
entire program. Since Mallove was increasingly successful in his attempts
to make cold fusion accepted by the scientific community at large,
and since he was particularly into
thermodynamics as well, then obviously Mallove was an
unacceptable threat and he had to go. Or else he would spoil a trillion
dollar deal and frustrate that entire vast movement now sweeping science
and government before it.
At the
entourage level, they "took care of the problem". No one in his right
mind would have believed that Gene would ever commit suicide, so the hit
could not be camouflaged to make it appear that he had "met with a sudden
suicide" on his way to the supermarket. Instead, it had to be by a simple
and easily understandable method that was (1) guaranteed and failproof,
and (2) made to look like a common criminal act. And so it was. A severe
beating was sufficient to guarantee death, and that was made to look like
a common burglar surprised in his work.
Meanwhile,
back to releasing and publicizing the principles of EFTV. Slowly the young
future scientists are beginning to get the real picture. We have the best
crop of oncoming young scientists and engineers we've ever had at our
universities. They are still being "sat on" and restrained by the
orthodox establishment and the universities, but one way or another it is
only a matter of time before these young scientists burst from their
chains and get all this done. Indeed, a few of the universities are
beginning to experience what can only be called "free energy activism"
in its student body. May they experience even more!
Surprisingly, a part of the environmental activist community also is
adamantly opposed to EFTV free energy systems. The last thing they wish is
that, by their own statements. These are the folks who corrupt the
otherwise legitimate meaning of "sustainment" to mean reduction of the human population by two-thirds at least, a returning to the primitive human lifestyle, having
all forests and streams pristine pure again, with humans confined only to
a few little villages or enclaves widely scattered here and there (in
short, like it was here in North America with the Indians before the
European explorers came). So a family would have an oil lamp, and one
heater. If you wished to go somewhere, you would either walk or ride a
bicycle. Very quietly one does not hear much discussion about the
two-thirds of humanity that would be "removed". One hears the echo here
of the Nazi gas chambers and of the burning of the Jews to solve the "Jewish problem". Don't laugh, it could happen again, in our lifetime.
The stage has long been set for this kind of activism by, e.g., early
proponents like Bertrand Russell. Quoting Russell:
"At present the population of the world is increasing at about 58,000 per
diem. War, so far, has had no very great effect on this increase, which
continued throughout each of the world wars... War has hitherto been
disappointing in this respect... but perhaps bacteriological war may prove
effective. If a Black Death could spread through the world once in every
generation, survivors could procreate freely without making the world too
full. The state of affairs might be unpleasant, but what of it?"
[Bertrand Russell, philosophical spokesman for a group of Westerners, in
his Impact of Science on Society.]
Now realize
that all kinds of biological warfare toxins and agents are already in the
hands of terrorists and inserted right here in the
It turns
out that one of the means to be used in destroying us is to destroy the
present centralized electrical power system. So to survive when that
happens, we desperately need cheap clean energy from the vacuum as quickly
as we can get it done, in production, and deployed in quantity. We must
have dependable decentralized energy that is fuel-free, pipeline-free,
etc., or else in the coming debacle our present centralized electrical
energy system will not survive and we shall be economically destroyed very
quickly.
It
wouldn't take very much (relatively speaking) for the scientific
community to very quickly provide permanent solutions to the energy crisis
forever. Simply get the staid old scientific establishment to unleash a
few of these sharp young grad students and post docs for two or three
years in this area, with just a little funding, and very shortly there
will never again be an energy crisis anywhere on earth. The problem here
lies with our top agencies such as the National Academy of Sciences, the
National Science Foundation, Department of Energy, the national labs, the
universities, etc. The prevailing body of our science is still completely
determined that the sad and terribly flawed electrical engineering model
shall not be tampered with or corrected, precisely so that such
energy-from-the-vacuum systems cannot be developed. The CEM/EE model
maintains Lorentz symmetry and thus uses equations that are Lorentz
invariant. That already destroys any modeling of excess usable EM energy
from the active vacuum or curved spacetime. But it makes the equations
much easier to solve, provides closed solutions, and this avoids the
necessity for near-total use of numerical methods. It also is worshipped
by mathematicians, who love "beauty" (symmetry) and abhor "asymmetry".
And real energy from the vacuum systems are asymmetrical systems a priori,
so that they violate Lorentz symmetry and thus the Lorentz invariant
standard equations cannot and does not describe the functioning of such
systems.
With my own
deteriorated physical condition and that of my beloved wife, my own
personal race is just about run. So these days I first take care of my
wife, and in the little time remaining I concentrate on doing whatever I
can to help with the MEG, and to help some other inventor colleagues who
independently have overunity systems, some even further along than our own
MEG.
The sad
thing is that EM energy is free and it always has been free. Once one pays
for a little switching and control (e.g., to assemble some charge or to
separate charges and make a dipole), then from that charge collection or
from that dipole there will continuously flow a steady stream of real
observable photons - real EM energy - in all directions. That steady
flow of absolutely free and real, usable EM energy extracted directly from
the seething subquantal vacuum fluctuations, will continue forever, with
no further work required by the operator. Instead of deliberately building
power systems that use half their energy to destroy the dipolarity (and
thereby kill the flow of free energy from the local vacuum), we should
long ago have been building only power systems that intercept and collect
and use the outflowing free energy, without using any of that collected
energy to touch or tamper with or destroy the free source of potential
energy flow.
Wryly,
Whittaker already showed in 1903 and 1904 that every EM field and EM
potential decomposes into a set of EM energy flows. Modern important
scientists such as Ziolkowski and Cornille have even advanced a bit
further along that same line. The original Whittaker paper of 1903 was
essentially ignored (until scientists such as Ziolkowski and Cornille came
along), but the paper in 1904 originated and established an entire little
branch of electrodynamics known as superpotential theory.
I really
don't care who gets it done and out there on the market worldwide, just
so long as it's done. We all need it, and we need it very quickly, else
shortly what we presently know as Western civilization will not survive at
all.
Best
wishes,
Tom Bearden
Dear Mr Bearden
Wishing you a wonderful New Year, with
much success in your area of work and especially a very good health,
for you and your family.
We are yet waiting for the MEG's
marketing...
Also in
What a wonderful day, if this year could
bring us (to all people on this earth) even a small O-U generator !
We still are hoping for !
With best wishes Cordialement Bernadette et Jean |