Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003
00:11:21 -0600
Frank,
I strongly suggest you
check the library for the three volumes of Modern Nonlinear Optics, 2nd
edition, Edited by Myron W. Evans, Wiley, 2001 and study the article we
referenced (there are also many other interesting articles). Or you can
look for additional material on website
www.aias.us.
Standard
Maxwell-Heaviside electrodynamics has a great many shortcomings! E.g.,
it assumes that every charge freely creates --- from nothing at all ---
all the energy it continuously pours out to form its associated EM
fields and potentials and their energy, expanding radially outward at
light speed from the moment the charge is created. In short,
Maxwell-Heaviside classical electrodynamics assumes that every joule of
EM field energy and EM potential energy in the universe is made by a
forbidden perpetual motion machine called a "source charge". Few texts
even mention this problem anymore, since they never solved the problem.
It has been solved since 1957 in particle physics, if one models the
active vacuum exchange with the charge and also includes the known
polarization of the vacuum (the clustering of virtual charge of opposite
sign around any "isolated" observable charge). With the included QFT
virtual clustering, one is dealing with a dipolarity and therefore with
the broken symmetry of opposite charges. That means that the "isolated
charge" continuously absorbs EM energy from the seething vacuum,
converts it (coherently integrates it) into observable photons, and
re-emits the energy as observable photons emitted in all directions,
thereby establishing the associated EM fields and potentials.
Simply try finding
anything in any conventional classical EM textbook on the exact
mechanism by which the charge creates its fields and potentials and
their energy, and from where it receives the input energy. Either the
charge totally falsifies the entire conservation of energy law, or else
the classical EM model is in serious need of revision and extension to
include the active vacuum and broken symmetry.
There are dozens of
other shortcomings and failures of the Maxwell-Heaviside model. Hence
for finer work, one really does need a higher group symmetry EM model,
such as O(3) or SU2XSU2, etc. Higher symmetry EM models have been
developed for particle physics, because the classical theory simply
fails to describe a great deal of the physical phenomena encountered.
There is an increasing number of electrodynamicists that are beginning
to work in such higher symmetry EM models, with the result that
electrodynamics is still a vitally developing field.
Best wishes,
Tom Bearden
Question on a statement on
Snells Law Parity
Frank |