| 
 
TOWARD A NEW ELECTROMAGNETICS  
        Part III: Clarifying the Vector Concept
 © 1983 T.E. Bearden  
      -- IMPLICATIONS --
  
          Some of the fundamental concepts of the new Tesla electromagnetics are presented. 
      The new concepts have startling implications: 
           (1)  No force or force field exists as such in vacuum. 
           (2)  Hertzian (transverse) electromagnetic waves do
      not travel through the vacuum, just as Tesla stated. 
           (3)  Forceless, massless Tesla (scalar) longitudinal waves actually transit the vacuum. 
      Tesla called them "electrical sound waves." 
           (4)  At present there are actually four different
      FUNDAMENTAL TYPES of vectorial entities in physics, erroneously confused as one and the same. 
          (5)  Tesla longitudinal scalar waves are also "time" waves and can affect anything and everything that exists in time. 
          (6)  The fundamental
      constants of nature (which exist in time) can be altered by Tesla scalar waves, which oscillate the values of the constants. 
          (7)  Every vector and scalar has an internal substructure, which can be independently affected and changed. 
      This allows the direct engineering of the virtual state and the vacuum itself. 
          (8)  All observable forces (electrical, mechanical, gravitational, etc.) arise in, on, and OF the actual substructure of the "accelerating mass particle" itself, not as an "external" massless force or force field applied "to" a mass . 
          (9)  Physical reality itself
      -- and the "physical laws of nature" 
can be deliberately changed and engineered. 
          (10)  All "physical reality" is totally internal to the physical changes of the mass particles of the detector system of the observer. 
          (11)  Relativity's speed of light limitation applies only to the changes of the basic mass particles of the detecting instrument. 
          (12)  Detection of superluminal effects cannot be accomplished by a "single stage" or "single shift " (single interaction) detector . 
          (13)  Detection of superluminal effects is permitted by "multiple
      stage" or "multiple shift" interactions where the last interaction is a conventional interaction of photon vs. detector particle. 
      (The two-slit apparatus for detection of electron diffraction is an example. First, the superluminal DeBroglie waves interact with the slits, which are "tuned" toward the electron's
      DeBroglie wavelength.  The interaction with TWO slits produces
      subluminal interference effects, which then interact back upon the physical electron. 
      The apparatus is thus an electron interferometer capable of detecting
      superluminal waves by a two-stage interaction). 
          (14)  Interference is the most common first-stage superluminal interaction to
      accomplish "downshifting" superluminal entities to luminal or
      subluminal velocities.  Superposition of superluminal "phase" waves (such as deBroglie waves, which individually always move faster than
      the speed of light) interferes the waves to create a subluminal group
      velocity, which may then interact with an ordinary mass particle in the
      detection system. 
                 (15) 
      Any otherwise physical vector must exist as an unzipped (segmented) or
      "shadow" vector in vacuum.  "Radiation" of a
      vector EM wave from the electron gas in an antenna into vacuum results in
      the "choking off" of the mass of the transversely oscillating
      electrons in the antenna.  Since the spinning electron mass is the
      "zipper" that makes or comprises the physical vector in the
      first place, this throttling of the mass flow unzips the E and B vectors,
      leaving whirling (massless magnetic scalar potential) segments of massless
      charge flux (massless electrostatic scalar potential).  This unzipped
      whirling pattern of charge flux (scalar massless A/Ø) is what radiates
      into vacuum and propagates through it.  This is a special kind of
      scalar wave pattern, not a physical or vector wave. 
                 (16) 
      The spin of a charged particle is the mechanism for integrating or
      "zipping together" the individual virtual fragments of a shadow
      vector into a real (observable) vector.  For "uncharged
      particles" such as neutrons, it is the spins of its virtual charged
      components. that accomplish the integration or zipping. 
                (17)  All
      fundamental charged particles are constantly accelerated.  There is
      no such thing as an "unaccelerated" particle, except as a gross
      average over time or length.  Further, all of them are spinning. 
                (18)  All
      changes to and from a physical vector or scalar system must arise in and
      come from its own internal substructure, which is zipped to its spinning
      particle of mass. 
                (19)  All
      fundamental particles are charged internally.  That is, they are
      dynamic assemblages of smaller charged particles.  If the average sum
      of the total internal charge is essentially zero over some finite, small
      increment of time, the particle is externally uncharged.  If the sum
      is not essentially zero, the particle is also externally charged. 
                (20) 
      There are no static physical things in existence.  In physical
      reality, something appears "static" only at a particular
      level.  Upon sufficiently fine examination, it is composed of
      accelerating parts, and thus comprised of "fluctuations." 
                (21) 
      Since (a) the basic physical (mass) vector consists of a "smeared particle,''
      where particle and smear are inseparable, (b) the conceptual particle also
      is accelerated, and (c) the "smearing" is for a small increment
      of time and a small increment of length; then the basic constituency of
      "physical reality" is inseparable "force x time x
      length," or action.  The basic "quantum" of physical
      change is thus comprised of action. 
                (22) 
      Since to "detect" we must "stop" the action, separate
      or split the quantum into two pieces ("canonical" pieces) , and
      compare (measure) one piece by throwing away the other, then each physical
      observable must have a differential operator (the "separating
      agent") corresponding to it.  This accounts for the fundamental
      postulate of quantum mechanics whereby every observable has a
      corresponding operator.  Further, since what remains is totally
      relative to what was split out and thrown away, physical change is totally
      "relative."  This accounts for the fact that observed
      reality is relative, each part to each other. 
                (23)  As
      a special case, we may assume that we can evaluate a physical change at a
      point (without length).  If so, when we discard length, the remaining
      basic vector is momentum.  This approximation holds only so long as
      the system to which it is applied essentially does not change over the
      quantal fragment of length discarded -- i.e., it holds for the linear
      case.  Conservation of momentum, then, is violated when sufficient
      nonlinearity in length is present. 
                 (24) 
      As a second special case, we may assume that we can evaluate a physical
      change in a spatial manner (without time).  If so, when we discard
      time, the remaining basic vector is energy (has the units of energy or
      work).  This approximation holds only so long as the system to which
      it is applied essentially does not change over the quantal fragment of
      time discarded -- i.e., it holds for the linear case.  Conservation
      of energy, then, is violated when sufficient nonlinearity in time is
      present.  Since a "virtual change" a priori is defined as a
      total nonlinearity in the observer's quantal time increment but not
      outside it, then virtual interactions can and do violate conservation of
      energy within that time increment, but not out of it -- so long as the
      time interval itself is considered linear.  If the time interval is
      sufficiently nonlinear, then the virtual change may result in violation of
      the conservation of energy externally to the time increment.  In that
      case, an "observable change" results . 
                 (25) 
      As a third special case, we may assume that we can evaluate the
      "instantaneous value" of a physical change at a static point in
      space.  To do so, we must discard both time (to be instantaneous) and
      length (to be at a spatial point), and the remaining basic vector is
      force.  This approximation holds only so long as the system to which
      it is applied essentially does not change over the quantal fragment of
      time or the quantal fragment of length discarded.  Conservation of
      force, then, is violated when sufficient nonlinearity in time or length is
      present. 
                (26)  A
      new conservation of energy law is required, one which unites the present
      conservation of energy law with an altered form of the conservation of
      charge law.  Briefly, the total equivalent of mass, observable
      energy, and massless charge (anenergy) is conserved. 
                (27)  All
      AL and At fragments are produced and destroyed one at a time, in the
      action fissioning of a single quantum of action (detection process). 
      Each ÑL
      and Ñt
      is discretized but not quantized.  Since quanta do not superpose, the
      "external universe" is continually created and destroyed in the
      detector's mass system, one quantum at a time, at a very high rate. 
      This interpretation gives physical meaning to the creation and
      annihilation operators of quantum mechanics. 
                (28) 
      Since the detecting mass system is itself continually created and
      destroyed one quantum at a time, ultimately all is mind changes, and only
      mind changes.  The observer's life, mind, and being transcend all
      materialistic interpretations of reality -- as indeed does the very fact
      of the "existence" of a perceived external universe. 
 Next
Page  |