|
CANCER
AND THE UNRESOLVED HEALTH ISSUES IN THE BIOLOGICAL Largely
taken from the author's presentation, "Mechanism for Long-Term
Cumulative Biological Effects of EM Radiation," 70th Annual Meeting of the
Alabama Academy of Science, University of Alabama at Huntsville, 25 March 1993. T.E. Bearden Abstract Both
postulates in the conventional EM bioeffects model are in error, as is the
classical electromagnetics model (CEM)
itself. Major errors in CEM are presented. The QM view is taken that all EM
phenomena are caused by the potentials, not the force fields. Using the
Whittaker/Ziolkowski (WZ) internal structure of the scalar potential, Bohm's
quantum potential and an engineerable variant of his hidden variable theory
emerge. A strong candidate emerges for the internal mechanisms used for mind,
thought, long term memory, and deep cellular control by Popp's master cellular
control system. An environmental negative feedback
mechanism is stated for long-term, cumulative causative
mutation, yielding Sheldrake's morphogenetic field, which is a species quantum
potential. Utilizing the new EM bioeffects model, Kaznacheyev's demonstration
that any cellular death or disease can be caused electromagnetically is
explained. A new definition for cancer is advanced, as is a long-term
cumulative mechanism that causes it. The mechanism for Priore's demonstrated
cures of terminal tumors in laboratory animals under rigorous scientific
protocols is explained. A solution for the major cumulative mechanism for
biological effects of EM fields and radiation is presented. A
self-targeting mechanism is presented whereby complex WZ EM biwave pumping
of the "cell as a nonlinear phase conjugate mirror material" produces
an exact EM antidote signal for the specific cellular disease. It is argued that
inexpensive, quick, nondebilitating, cures can be developed for most major dread
diseases, including cancer, arteriosclerosis, and AIDS. Priore's remarkable and
previously unexplained cures of terminal tumors in lab animals are cited as
examples of applying the new model, albeit unwittingly. The Basic EM Bioeffects Model Is In Error As
is well-known, the field of EM fields and radiation effects on biological
systems is actually in something of a shambles. In over 40 years of studies and experiments
by careful researchers, the results are inconsistent, contradictory, and usually
difficult or sometimes impossible to replicate. Attempted replications often
give contradictory results, erratically. Researchers cannot rigorously answer
even the simplest question, such as "Does power line radiation contribute
to the incidence of cancer and leukemia, and if so, how and under what
circumstances?" Causative mechanisms have so far eluded research. Powerful
vested interests fund many of the studies. Consequently a great deal of
controversy exists in the field. Opinions and
positions range from the ''microwave oven" position that
"if it doesn't appreciably heat tissue, it doesn't harm biological
organisms," to the "total fear" position that "any and all
nonionizing radiation is harmful; we just don't know by what mechanism."
Legal actions to limit human EM radiation exposure are increasingly being
initiated by concerned citizens' groups. What
has actually been "proven" by the nearly fruitless EM bioeffects
effort to date is that the fundamental EM
bioeffects model being utilized by the researchers is totally inadequate for the In
tackling this model foundations problem, I have performed a systems engineering layout
of the fundamental EM bioeffects model, and stated its two major postulates.
Both postulates turn out to be in error! Immediately one can easily see why
the field is in such a state of confusion. However, no true systems engineer
would stop there. I have also performed a systems engineering layout of precise
corrections for the two postulates, thereby correcting and extending the model
so that it can yield consistent, replicable results and causative mechanisms.
All of this is a rigorous procedure, and straightforward systems engineering
methodology. However, the results point to profound
changes, which I have been immersed in deeply studying for quite some time. Out
of this approach has emerged something quite fundamental: a strong candidate for the internal mechanisms used for mind, thought,
long term memory, and the deep cellular control system for all cells of the body.
A mechanism for species adaptation also
emerges that is quite capable of explaining (and yielding)
long-term directed mutation, including the "species jump," where
a species such as a bird emerges in short order (not gradually) from a species
such as a reptile. The known "species jump" has been a deep mystery to
evolution theory, which simply could not explain it. Another thing that has
emerged is a startling new electromagnetic
causative mechanism for cancer, leukemia, etc. At the June 1993
Brain-Mind Symposium in Los Angeles, I will present that exact mechanism.
The mechanism is capable of laboratory test, and validation or falsification. We
will also present an entirely new approach to EM effects on biological
organisms, and present the major new mechanism involved. The new mechanism has
fundamental application to the theory of diseases, and offers potential curative
mechanisms for dread diseases such as cancer, arteriosclerosis, and AIDS. I
explain some of the necessary background in the following paragraphs. Classical Electromagnetics
is Seriously Flawed As
is well-known, there exist severe contradictions between classical
electromagnetics (CEM), general relativity (GR), and quantum mechanics (QM). As
presently constructed the three disciplines cannot be unified, even by Herculean
efforts. Particularly with respect to the primary causative agents for
electromagnetic phenomena, the foundations of QM and of CEM are in profound
disagreement. CEM assumes the forcefields as
primary causes, paying only lip service to the potentials and treating them as
primarily mathematical conveniences. QM, on the
other hand, has long since [since 1959] shown that the force fields are
simply effects
in and on the charged particle system, and are not causes. Instead, QM has
shown that the potentials are the primary causes of all EM phenomena. In charged
particle systems, potentials can interfere and cause observable EM phenomena
such as the Aharonov-Bohm effect in the complete absence of the force fields.
Herein lies the reason for the present
dire straits of EM bioeffects research. We explain further: CEM
theory was originally formulated by James Clerk Maxwell in terms of quaternions.
Note that quaternion algebra has a much higher topology than either vectors or
tensors, the mathematics in which CEM is presently expressed. None of the
present "Maxwell's equations" _ universally taught as due to Maxwell _
ever appeared in anything by Maxwell himself. Depending upon what
you wish to call a fundamental equation, Maxwell's true equations
are the numerous
quaternion equations included in one
almost incomprehensible chapter of his 1873 book. The present four "Maxwell's
Equations" are in fact due mostly to Oliver Heaviside, and to a lesser
extent to Gibbs and Hertz. The major player was Heaviside, a very brilliant but self-educated
man who never attended University. At
the time Maxwell's book was published, Heaviside was just teaching himself
calculus and differential equations. Seeing the book, he was electrified by it,
and Maxwell became his undying hero.
Maxwell died not long after, of stomach cancer. Heaviside believed _ as did almost every scientist at the time _ in the older medieval tradition
that forces were
the causes of all physical effects. He had great difficulty with the potentials,
stating that they were "mystical and
should be murdered from the theory."
We know today in modern quantum field
theory that forces are effects, not primary causes of anything. In fact, it is
the exchange of virtual particles with a mass that generates all forces upon it.
As is wellknown to foundations physicists today, "force" does not
exist without the mass present to be acted upon, and without the action of a
potential gradient upon the mass. We know that there are no force fields in the
vacuum, and hence potential gradients in the vacuum are not forces, even though
they are commonly assumed to be. CEM has not been corrected for these glaring
defects: it prescribes force fields in the vacuum, and it prescribes that
potential gradients are forces, even in the absence of any mass for the
gradients to act upon. Heaviside
also abhorred the quaternion theory. The coupling of a scalar component with
three directional components was, in his view, "mixing apples and
oranges." He knew that engineers would never master Maxwell's use of
quaternion mathematics because of its difficulty. Consequently, Heaviside simply
chopped off the scalar component of the quaternion and discarded it, then
formulated this new "truncated to a vector" version as a much simpler
mathematics, albeit of decreased topology. What he unknowingly threw away was
the ability of the quaternion theory to capture an internal
deterministic, vectorial EM structure of the scalar potential. [It turns out that he also discarded the unification of EM and gravitation by throwing out the scalar component, but
that is outside the scope of my presentation.] Years later as a lonely
recluse in a small upstairs apartment, Heaviside turned back to quaternions to
work on a theory of gravitation, according to papers found hidden beneath the
floor of his study many years after his
death. Learned
journals of the day would not accept Heaviside's papers for publication, because
of the assumed "brutality" of his mathematical methods. So Heaviside
began publishing very practical papers in a technical magazine, for the time
roughly equivalent to Scientific American today. These practical papers gave transmission line theory,
transformer theory, etc. _ things very useful to the early would-be
"engineers" who were struggling with installing telegraph lines,
undersea telegraph cables, etc. The vector mathematics utilized by Heaviside was
much easier to understand and apply, and his work was eminently practical.
Consequently it was eagerly seized upon and applied. The result was that
Heaviside's EM model became the ipso facto CEM standard. Note that, at the time,
only about 30 or so scientists in the world were truly "learned" in EM
_ either from the vector standpoint or from the quaternion standpoint. Further,
not much practical work was being done
by the few quaternion practitioners. A
short "debate" over whether EM should use Maxwell's quaternion model
or the Heaviside/Gibbs vector model occurred prior to the turn of the century,
mostly in the journal Nature. It never
involved over a handful of scientists, and it wasn't much of a debate. The
vectorists simply threw out the quaternion EM theory and adopted the vector theory
of Heaviside and Gibbs. Note that this represented a substantial curtailment of
Maxwell's actual theory. In other words,
you can actually do a lot more in and with EM fields
and circuits than what now appears in "modern" EM theory, and "modern"
EM analysis won't even show it. Barrett's
Oscillator-Shuttle-Circuit analysis of Tesla's actual patented
circuits shows this clearly and resoundingly. Also, living
systems utilize the discarded subset of EM for their most vital control
functions, and the present theory and methodology will not detect or "see
" this. Thus this curtailment alone has resulted in the profound
crippling of the conventional EM bioeffects model and efforts to apply it. The Present CEM is a Flawed
Subset of Nature's
Electromagnetics So we have several serious things that are quite wrong with current CEM theory.
First, the theory (and its practice) are artificially limited
to only a subset of the real EM that can be achieved and utilized. The present
CEM unwittingly excludes the very type of EM utilized by living systems for
their deepest control functions. It also excludes electrogravitation.
Second, Maxwell's theory was actually based upon the assumption of a mechanical
(material) ether, which meant that he could logically assign material forces to the
"vacuum" or "ether fluid." Heaviside's translation (and
curtailment) to vectors did not charge this "material ether" and
"force field in vacuum" assumption. However,
in 1887 the Michelson-Morley experiment resoundingly destroyed the notion
that the ether is material. If the ether
were truly a thin material fluid, then forces and EM force fields would
indeed exist in it. Since the ether is not material and forces exist only in,
on, and of matter, no E-field or B-field exists in the nonmaterial
vacuum; none ever has, and none ever will. In his three volumes of physics,
Feynman pointed out that only the potential
for the EM force fields exists in
the vacuum; the only thing that exists in vacuum is potentials, after all! The vacuum is just a fantastic collection of interfering
potentials and potential gradients. Rigorously, the E- and B-fields
we detect with our instruments exist
only in the electron gas in the probes we utilize. This is well-known to a few foundations
physicists, but the CEM model has never been corrected for these foundations
errors. Note that the loss of the material ether also falsifies
one of the three key assumptions in modern potential theory: the notion that the
gradient of the potential comprises a force field. We know today that the CEM
equation E = -Ñf, is actually incorrect for
the vacuum. It
is correctly measured; since that is exactly what is detected when the vacuum Ñf potential
gradient couples to the free electrons in our detecting/measuring instruments.
What we detect as E, however, is actually [(Ñf
· (e-)], or the potential
gradient coupled to the electrons, including their masses. Specifically, we do
not detect the nonmaterial (VO that actually exists in the vacuum. We detect
electron wiggles in the free electron gas in the conductors of our instruments;
we do not detect "vacuum wiggles" per se. Neither
Maxwell's quaternion EM equations nor Heaviside's vector EM equations include
electron spin effects, but actually model electricity as a "thin
fluid." Hence the EM equations of either model are fluid dynamic equations.
Specifically, the measured transverse EM waves exist in the electron gas of our
detectors; any detector detects only its own internal change, not the
external agent that interacted and caused that internal change. White the
"signal" races down the conductors in our probes and sensors at
essentially the speed of light, the "free" electrons in the electron
gas in those conductors are longitudinally restrained. The electrons must essentially
move laterally from their initial distribution inside the conductor to its skin,
then "slip" slightly down the wire on the skin at only the electron
drift velocity, which is a fraction of a centimeter per second. The spinning
electrons in the electron gas, being longitudinally restrained, act as gyroscopes. When disturbed by an interacting force, they precess.
It follows that the lateral motion of the electrons inside the conductors of our
detectors is just this "electron precession." It also follows that the
direction of the disturbing force must be at right angles to the electrons'
measured transverse precession movement. Rigorously, EM waves in the vacuum thus
are longitudinal,
not
transverse. We measure transverse waves in our detectors and instruments because we are
detecting and measuring the electron
precession waves in the free electron
gas in the conductors of those instruments. But
as Tesla pointed out, there are no Hertz waves in the vacuum; instead, EM waves
in the vacuum are longitudinal "sound" waves, or waves of rarefaction and compression of the medium. From modern QM we also know what the medium
is: it is a flux of virtual particles. Again, as can be seen, the CEM model is
seriously in error in its representation of EM waves in the vacuum. We
will not pursue this further; it is well-known to a few physicists in
foundations work (but not to most electrical engineers and electrical
physicists!) that classical EM theory is seriously flawed, and that it should be
upgraded to correct those flaws. As is well-known in QM since 1959, it is
the potentials
that are the actual causes of all EM phenomena, and the potentials can
interfere to cause real EM effects in charged particle systems, even in the
absence of the force fields. The Aharonov-Bohm effect is an example, as
are several other derivative effects wellestablished in the literature. What
has been ignored even in QM, however, is the organized
internal structure of the potential, even though the original (vector)
discovery by Stoney occurred in 1897 and was extended by Whittaker in 1903. This
internal structure of the scalar potential had been implicitly present in
Maxwell's 1873 quaternion theory, as an integral part of the scalar component of
the quaternion resultant of the interaction
between two or more quaternions. In quaternions, a scalar entity may be
regarded as a special quaternion entity whose translation has been reduced to
zero. A vector entity may be regarded as a special quaternion entity all aspects
of which are translating, and no nontranslating aspect is present. Thus the
scalar quaternion entity may be totally composed of vector components, so long
as they sum or multiply to a zero translation resultant but possess a finite
nontranslating magnitude. The Scalar Potential Has an Internal Bidirectional Wave-Pair
Structure In
a profound but ignored 1903 paper of enormous consequences, E.T. Whittaker
decomposed the scalar EM potential into a harmonic set of bidirectional wave
pairs, extending the original 1897 work of Stoney. Each wave pair consists of a
wave and its phase conjugate replica (its "anti-wave" or
"time-reversed twin".). Thus the scalar potential has a rich
internal biwave structure. [Further, one can make
a scalar potential by simply assembling the necessary multiple waves, and
one can alter the internal structure of the potential at will by altering the
waves utilized in the assembly process.] In 1904 Whittaker published a
formidable second paper, showing that all of CEM could readily be replaced by
scalar potential (hidden multi-wave)
interferometry. In other words, scalar EM is far more basic and extensive
than is the present CEM with its emphasis upon the force fields. E.g.,
you can alter the internal structure of the Schroedinger potential, and place
deterministic biwave "hidden variables" inside. You can then
"engineer" these hidden variables _ and consequently the Schroedinger
potential _ by external means. In other words, you can even accomplish at least limited engineering of quantum change itself. This of
course reduces the Gibbs statistics (which assumes a totally random quantum
change) to a special case, and provides a more general case of chaotic quantum
change, which is still statistical but may contain hidden order. Note that this
statement is experimentally testable. It also resolves the greatest problem in
quantum mechanics today: the problem of the missing chaos (hidden order). In
1989 Ignatovich placed a paper in the American
Journal of Physics
pointing out a similar internal biwave structure of the Schroedinger
potential, but none of our scientists seems to have realized the profound
implications. If we apply these proven
mathematical extensions of electromagnetics,
we are now dealing
with a higher topology hidden variable theory, along the lines shown by Bohm,
but one that is engineerable on the lab bench.
In
1985, a brilliant EM scientist named Ziolkowski independently rediscovered
Whittaker's internal biwave harmonic decomposition of the scalar potential. He
also extended the "internal structure" theory, to encompass not only
the sum set but also the product set. Since the product of waves represents
modulation, Ziolkowski's brilliant work provides the setting for direct information communication capability in the internal
structuring of the scalar EM potential. Further,
this internal channel is in the virtual state, so one is accomplishing virtual
state engineering, in the sense of the vacuum engineering posed by Nobelian Lee.
If one uses a 4space Minkowski model, the Whittaker/Ziolkowski channel
information may be viewed as subspace
communications.
If one utilizes an n-space Kaluza-Klein model, where n is greater
than 4, then the Whittaker/Ziolkowski channel information may be viewed as hyperspace communications. Living
systems already use this inner EM channel. Living Systems Use the Internal Channel Communication It
turns out that living systems utilize precisely the Whittaker/Ziolkowski (W/Z)
mechanism for their deepest functions and control systems _ including mind,
thought, long-term memory, and the master cellular control system (MCCS)
discovered by Dr. Popp of Germany. What we are stating is that, for the very first
time, we now know where and how the mind's
"deepest
software" is, its fundamental mechanism, and how to go about programming it
directly. However,
we first must develop new measurement instruments. Unfortunately,
present EM instruments are almost all only "electron-wiggle"
detectors; they detect only the translation
of electrons. A gradient in
the potential will couple to electrons and translate them. The gradient-free potential does not translate electrons, and it is the internal biwave
W/Z structure of that gradient-free potential that we need to measure.
Presently no known instrumentation will do that. However,
if two different scalar potentials are interfered [Whittaker 1904], their
interference reproduces potential gradients [normal "force field" EM],
which do couple to electrons and translate them. In
fact, potential gradients (which in CEM are erroneously called "force fields")
were already shown by Whittaker to be entirely due to the interferometry of two
scalar potentials. So new "scalar interferometry" instruments must be
developed to "outfold" the internal contents of the scalar potential
as gradients, and then utilize normal instrumentation to measure those
interference gradients and calculate the potential's internal structuring. One
form for the detector is the use of a standard potential (with a known internal
biwave structure) inside a Faraday-shielded chamber, so that the test
gradient-free potential (which penetrates such a cage) interferes with the
standard potential inside the cage to produce gradients therein. A probe
in the interference zone detects the gradients as electron translations, which
are conducted externally to amplifiers, meters, spectrum analyzers, computer
programs, etc. The end result is the determination of the internal WZ structure
of the test potential. Other detector types are possible; this is just a
"straightforward" type. Thoughts, Mind, Memory, and Cellular Control Are Measurable What
we are saying is that, by developing the proper instrumentation, it is possible
to directly detect and examine thoughts, memory, and deep control system
functioning of the biological organism, including the deep internalistics of its
personal quantum potential. We are speaking of the pending emergence of an
experimental science, not just a speculation. However,
we are dealing now with a form of "hidden variable" theory, but one
that is engineerable and testable. So we will become directly involved with
Bohm's quantum potential, both experimentally and theoretically. A quantum
potential can connect widely separated systems by instantaneous effects, as if
the systems were not separated but were located together as a single system.
Further, the quantum potential does not have a single localized source.
Suffice it to say that in 1991 I published the discovery of how a quantum
potential is actually created. If one utilizes the proven
"self-targeting" or iterative phase conjugate shooting mechanism
from the Strategic Defense Initiative, and applies it to the WZ waves internal
to the scalar EM potentials from two separated charges, then in a dense signal
environment the selftargeting interaction may be initiated, so that the
separate potentials merge into a single The
point is, the quantum potential also has a
W/Z internal
structure. And
that structure can be deliberately created and engineered by external means.
Action at a distance is not only possible but engineerable. Living Systems and Quantum Potentials It
turns out that the living organism utilizes a quantum potential _ a special
scalar potential connecting
all its internal atomic nuclei _ for its volition, deep control, and mind
and thought processes and operations. This can even be taken as a flat
definition of a living system. A living system utilizes internal WZ structuring
of this scalar potential connecting all the atoms (nuclei) of its body mass, for
its deepest control processes. Any system not having or doing this is not a
living system. This also resolves the age-old philosophical question of
how mental intent cm cause physical
response, but that is beyond the scope of my presentation. It also explains why
viruses can be precipitated out of solution as a crystal, and the crystal stored
for decades. Then when the crystal is redissolved, the individual viruses
separate and resume their "living" state. Suspended animation of the
viruses results when their physical matter and its quantum potential remain
intact, and the stored WZ structures in the quantum potentials on the atomic
nuclei of that matter remain the same. It
further turns out that the species itself has a much weaker (at a deeper level
topologically) quantum potential connecting all its members (all the atomic
nuclei in their bodies). This corresponds to Sheldrake's morphogenetic field _
that field is just a species quantum
potential. Jung's collective unconscious, e.g., can be directly expressed in
this model scientifically and testably _ but again that is beyond the scope of
this presentation. Newton's Third Law Requires Forces to Occur in Oppositive Pairs Newton's
third law is a sleeping tiger, with surprising implications when awakened and
explored. For example, it rigorously requires that forces (including EM forces)
must occur in oppositive pairs, This alone falsifies the CEM notion that oscillating "singular-force" electric and magnetic waves appear in either a material ether or
physical matter. At least two waves must exist, the wave and its oppositive or antiwave.
Further, the wave and antiwave must be intimately coupled. Heretofore the
antiwave has simply been ignored, or when anyone pointed out that it was present
in our detectors, it was just considered to be "Newton's third law reaction
wave." "Newton's third law" was just mysteriously invoked, as if
it had no causative mechanism. Yet in quantum field theory the cause of all
forces is the absorption or emission of virtual particles. The cause of all mechanical and electromagnetic
forces is the absorption or emission of virtual photons. So Newton's third law for mechanical and electromagnetic
reactions must also be due to the exchange of virtual photons. In other words,
there was an extra half of the "something" in the vacuum that
interacted with our detectors and gave us the "free electron gas's
transverse precession waves. That "extra half' was exactly equal and
opposite, and interacted in the atomic nuclei of the conductors and the mass of
the instrument to give a set of physical Newtonian recoils. That half is equal
and opposite to the half we actually recognized. The point is, equal and
opposite forces actually interacted with our instrument. Thus a stress wave
interacted with it, not a unitary oscillating wave. What
occurs in vacuum must be a stress wave, not a unitary force field wave. In
short, as stated (but not elaborated) by Feynman, it is a potential
wave, or an oscillation in the potential gradients and magnitudes, not the
force fields. Since in modern theory force is an effect and not a cause, we interpret and extend Newton's third law
to state that the causes of all forces
must occur in oppositive pairs also. Thus the cause of an EM force field must be
the interaction of two scalar potentials _ just as Whittaker's 1904 paper
proves. In
quantum field theory any mechanical or EM force is caused on a mass by
absorption and emission of virtual photons. Accordingly, let us examine the
smallest possible EM or mechanical "force" _ that one caused by the
absorption of a single virtual photon. Newton's third law requires that two
photons (the causes) must occur, not one. Further, in all cases, the one must be
the exact antiparallel to the other. The only thing always meeting that
condition for a photon is its exact antiphoton _ its time-reversed,
phase conjugate replica twin. But a phase conjugate replica photon must also superpose spatially with its parent photon
_ that's what phase conjugate replicas normally do, according to the distortion correction theorem of nonlinear
phase conjugate optics. Thus instead of the conventional "single
photon" interaction, the actual vacuum entity engaged in the interaction
with an atom is a coupled
photon/antiphoton pair. A coupled photon/antiphoton pair has spin-2,
hence is a graviton. Gravitons and Graviton Interaction So
arguably "photon interaction" has been graviton
interaction all along. In the interaction with an atom, the graviton splits
into a photon and an antiphoton. The photon usually interacts with the electron
shells, being absorbed by an electron to raise its energy level, then
re-emitted and scattered outward
from the atom. This absorption and scattering of photons _ containing
their components of energy and time _ from the electron shells of the atom
creates movement of the atom through external observer time. The photon
interaction between a mass and its environment creates the forward flow of time
for that atom and its seemingly entropic external (photon interaction created)
universe. The
antiphoton half of the graviton is time-reversed, which we see as spatially
reversed. Consequently we see it move in the opposite direction to its externally-directed
photon twin. So the antiphoton focuses inward and interacts with the atomic
nucleus, providing the Newtonian third law recoil of the atom. The blithe
assumption of an "automatic" third law reaction force has always
concealed the fact that the so-called photon interaction is actually a graviton interaction. Further, the positive charge of the atomic
nucleus is due to the time reversal interactions of antiphotons with the
nucleons, which reverses the charge from that of the negatively charged
electrons in the atom's electron shells. Proof: Excising the Antiphoton Violates Newton's Third Law This
graviton interaction hypothesis is testable. Note that, if the hypothesis is
correct, then when an atom or mass emits antiphotons or antiwaves (phase
conjugate photons or phase conjugate replica waves), it means that the
inward-burrowing antiphotons have been "tricked" into coming out
of the atom instead, so they can comprise the time-reversed wave. If they
come outward instead of going inward when they split from the parent gravitons,
they do not interact with the nuclei to cause their recoil. In that case, there
would be no recoil. And indeed, so it is.
In a phase conjugate mirror material, the mirror does not recoil when it emits a
phase conjugate replica wave, even a powerful one due to powerful pumping. This
is not true when the mirror material emits a pseudo-conjugate wave. A
pseudo-conjugate mirror, e.g., emits an ordinary
''time-forward" wave with a distorted wave front, so that it will
"retroreflect" in a manner similar to the phase conjugate replica wave.
However, the pseudo-conjugate wave is not a true time-reversed wave.
Consequently, the mirror will recoil
when it emits the pseudoconjugate wave, because the antiphotons from the
graviton interaction still penetrate to the Looking
at the photon aspects of this, one realizes that one must be very careful in
applying the conventional assumption that the photon and the antiphoton are
identically the same. Actually they are not the same "internally." The
photon can be thought of as carrying or consisting of (+ Graviton Lattice Structure
of the Scalar
Potential When
we examine the WZ structure of a scalar potential, in each biwave the wave and
antiwave are phase conjugates. It follows that the photons in the wave and the
antiphotons in the antiwave are phase conjugates also. This means that, as the
two waves flow through each other spatially, photon/antiphoton pairs continually
couple and uncouple. Hence gravitons continually couple and uncouple. Further,
since the wave pair frequencies are phaselocked between pairs, the scalar potential is a phaselocked lattice of statistical
(continually forming and unforming) gravitons. Let
us now consider the interactions of an organism with environmental photons as
the interactions of the organism with environmental gravitons,
and specifically
with graviton lattices. Cumulative Buildup in the Quantum Potential of the Antisignal If
the photon half (of the graviton interactions) in
the electron shells of the living body are considered as environment
signals/interactions, then precise antisignals or
anti-interactions, constituting perfect negative feedback from all of an
organism's physical environmental experiences, are experienced in the organism's
atomic nuclei. Note that there they have partially affected the internal
structuring of the quantum potentials _ both the personal quantum potential and
the species quantum potential. The point is, cumulative
negative feedbacks (exact phase conjugates) for all the environmental
experiences and stresses an organism experiences, build
in both the personal QP and the species QP of that organism. A part of the entire species' cumulation of species-common
antisignals also exists deep in the quantum potential of the living biological
system. So
for any protracted stress experienced by the organism, in its personal QP a
coherent cumulative negative countermeasure feedback _ one which by its
time-reversed nature would reduce that stress _ continually builds. The
phase conjugates of the "well-rounded" or highly varying
stresses of multiple types will tend to mostly balance or "zero out."
However, a sustained stress of one kind will result in coherent cumulation and
increase in the "signal-tonoise ratio" of the amplitude of the
antisignal for that particular stress, compared to the amplitude of the average
of all the antisignals experienced. This is similar to the case where, in a sea
of radar noise, a coherent radar signal were continually present and integrating
coherently. Continual coherent integration, of course, results in continual
increase of the signal-to-noise ratio for the coherent signal, and
eventually it emerges from the "sea of noise" as a discernible [in
this case, observable and physical] antisignal. This
"cumulative kindling of antisignals" occurs in both the personal QP
and the species QP; however, the species QP is many, many orders of magnitude
less than the personal QP. Hence much greater time is required for
"kindling" of species changes (evolution) than for kindling individual
countering adaptations. Exercising
to get in shape is a simple example of physically stressing the body cells so
that the high-level feedback mechanism in the MCCS will kindle appropriate
antisignals and order the cells to adjust their functioning in a fashion such
that the level of performance being called for can be
accomplished more easily, thus reducing the stress level. The adaptive
mechanism ordering the adjustment of the body cells is the coherent negative
feedback in the personal QP, created from the stress signals from the sustained
"workout" exercises. This is a fairly rapid, "high-level"
mechanism; many other much slower (and some much faster) feedback reaction mechanisms
also exist. Hypoxia As a Result of Interference
With Hydrogen Bonding to Hemoglobin We
now point out the recently discovered water H-bonding effect on the
hemoglobin in the blood, where the H-bonding activity increases the
ability of the hemoglobin to carry oxygen. Some 60 or 70 water molecules
surround the hemoglobin molecule, engaging in extensive Hbonding interactions
with it, which substantially increases the hemoglobin's purely chemical ability
to bind and transport oxygen. Importantly, contamination of this water in the
blood fluid drastically affects this H-bonding benefit, and reduces the
hemoglobin's ability to carry the extra oxygen. Thus contamination of the
internal blood fluid by chemicals, agricultural pesticides, smoke,
etc. directly
and dramatically lower the oxygen availability to the body's cells,
resulting in a continuing "oxygen hungry" state (hypoxia) in most of
the body's cells. It also is now known that H-bond structuring of water is highly dynamic
and constantly adaptable, and it possesses a high degree of internal order. A
conglomerate of H-bond structures in an area or a volume can be considered
an H-bond potential, since the
gradient oppositions sum to produce stress potentials. Thus in the
H-bonding fluid surrounding the hemoglobin molecule, there exists an
H-bond scalar potential, and by Whittaker/Ziolkowski (W/Z) decomposition
it has a multi-wave structure. Any and all contamination of the fluid _
including by electromagnetic fields and signals, chemicals, etc. _ alters the
H-bonding structuring and hence the internal W/Z structure of the
H-bond potential. The end result
of
adulteration
of the H-bonding structure
of the blood fluid is a condition
of hypoxia
induced in the cells of the body due to reduced oxygen transport by the
hemoglobin
of
the red blood cells. Any
single EM signal is the result of the interference of two scalar EM potentials,
as shown by Whittaker. It is the result of the interference of the internal
EM wave structures of those scalar EM potentials. Multi-signal EM
radiation must be regarded as interference of multiple pairs of scalar
potentials. These interfering potentials penetrate to the atomic nucleus in the
body, and thus interact with the internal personal quantum potential utilized by
the body in its deep cellular control. Also this multi-signal EM
radiation, no matter how weak, directly
interacts with the Hbonding structure of the H-bonding blood fluid. Even
single-signal EM radiation still forms
oppositive pairings with the weak fields already existing in the body, thus also
forming W/Z structured potentials. From the interferences in the body of
multiple such potentials and their internal structures, there also are created
gradient (force field) interactions upon the blood cells and the hemoglobin. In
short, low-level background EM radiation can also interact with the Hbonding
of the hemoglobin to seriously lower its oxygen transport capability, just as
any other contaminant. The denser the external environment, the greater is the
interferometry and the interference with the hydrogen-bonding augmentation
of oxygen transport. It follows that, when thrust into a truly dense signal
environment, some exposed individuals may receive a "cumulative
H-bonding interference dosage" that, when added to their existing
prior dosage, is Chemical, Mechanical, and Electrical Interactions are Electromagnetic
Anyway Indeed,
chemistry is largely due to electric charge and charge distribution anyway. So
if we view the physical contaminants in the blood view chemically,
they are caused by electromagnetic means at root basis. Thus even the
"chemical" contaminants interact electrically and via potential
(multiwave) interferometry with the H-bonding potential. Further, in
quantum field theory, all mechanical forces are due to the exchange of virtual
photons, and hence also are electromagnetic
at their very basis. The bottom line is that all chemical, mechanical, and electrical
interactions are in fact electromagnetically caused. Further, since both the
internal and external structures of the potential are engineerable, the
mechanical and electrical forces on the mass particles _ and the virtual photon
exchanges causing these forces _ are directly engineerable. All
of these chemical, mechanical, and electrical interactions in the cells can be affected
and even engineered electrically. This is true from the atomic nucleus, to
molecules, to material lattices, to human cells, to tissues, and even to the
mind and long-term storage templates (internal
WZ structured forms
in the QP) in the biological organism. As
cam be seen there are many other weaker, direct interactions of
"force-field" radiation; however, here we are interested in the
interaction of that radiation with the inner structure of the H-bond potential'.,
to reduce the oxygen transport capability of the hemoglobin. In
any case, the total sustained interaction of chemical and physical contaminants
and EM fields
and radiation can result in a sustained oxygen-deprivation (hypoxia)
condition for the body cells, even to a dramatic degree. Further, by
graviton interaction, a sustained,
cumulated set of antisignals is also automatically generated in the personal
quantum potential as a set of negative feedback signals to take corrective
actions to alleviate the oxygen depletion condition. Note that the
cumulating antisignal condition is general and affects the immune system and its
cells as well. The Example of Smoking Obviously
the tars, particles, and nicotine of the smoke inhaled by the smoker
dramatically contaminate the fluid in the smoker's lungs, in the very place
where the hemoglobin of the red cells is taking on oxygen. Drastic interference
with the H-bond stimulus of the hemoglobin occurs. The result is an
immediate and dramatic reduction of the oxygen-transport capability of all
the hemoglobin in the red cells as they pass through the contaminated lungs and
are exposed to fluid contamination. An immediate oxygen-deprivation
condition thus is created in the body. Due to the magnitude of the stressing
signal, the major portion of the antisignal is also of substantial magnitude _
hence immediate counteraction orders accumulate in the personal QP, specifically
in Popp's master cellular control system. So very rapidly the body has negative
feedback countersignals from the central cellular control system, ordering the
body to take actions to reduce the cellular need for oxygen. The metabolism is
lowered, the body relaxes, and the appetite is suppressed; all counters to the
cells' hypoxia condition by lowering the cellular requirement for oxygen. In
spite of heroic "high level antisignal" physical cellular
compensations to reduce the use of oxygen, however, the condition of cellular
oxygen shortage may still continue, in the case of the smoker or substantial
environmental contaminants such as secondary smoke. So in addition to the prompt
countersignals, additional much-weaker countersignals are also slowly
accumulating in the personal quantum potential's central cellular control
system.
Cumulative,
Deep, Long-Term Countering Signals We
now need one additional bit of information. In addition to its personal quantum
potential, a biological organism also is connected to a species quantum
potential joining all the members of its species. This is a much weaker quantum
potential; nonetheless, potentials superpose, so one small "part" of
the personal quantum potential is actually the species quantum potential _ in
other words, Sheldrake's morphogenetic field. Deep within its own personal
quantum potential the living system also
possesses all the cumulatively ordered steps (species antisignals that were
implemented) of its species evolution. With very long
coherent cumulation, countersignals can be stimulated in the individual
bio-organism's quantum potential _ and in its deep cellular control _ that
are counters to the original signals that ordered directed mutation and
the primeval evolution of the constituent cells themselves. In
a sustained cellular hypoxia stress environment, the "do whatever is
necessary to reduce oxygen usage" countersignals will continue to cumulate
from successively deeper levels in the QP over an appreciable time. These
continue to slowly "kindle" after the "first high-level
antisignal actions" that cumulated past the "noise" (quantum)
threshold reached their limits of physical reactions and are still insufficient
to resolve the problem. As the hypoxia stress in the cells continues, then much
weaker but coherent countersignals that trigger deeper cellular adaptation
actions eventually have time to cumulate past the quantum threshold to the observable
state. These long-term cumulated antisignals come from much deeper, even
from the species quantum potential itself. These
cumulating deep countersignals are phase conjugates _ reversals,
or dedifferentiation commands _ of the previous directed mutation signals that
ordered evolutionary changes in their predecessor cells in the far distant past.
These long-term antisignals thus
contain a signal to reverse the original cumulative countersignals in the
cellular species potential that caused the cells
early ancestral anaerobic cells on
earth to change (differentiate) into largely aerobic cells, after the earth's
atmosphere acquired significant amounts of oxygen. In short, a deep signal is
slowly cumulating that, when it emerges, will order the dedifferentiation of the
affected cell back down the evolutionary road toward the anaerobe. The first
steps are reductions of centralized cellular control, including growth control. In
other words, under sustained cellular hypoxia a countermeasures signal to the
cells, ordering them to dedifferentiate back toward the anaerobic state, is
slowly building in the personal quantum potential from a much weaker, lower level
"under the common countersignals noise level" all the while. If significant
oxygen-deprivation continues for a sufficiently long time, this deep
countersignal eventually emerges in Popp's MCCS system in the personal QP, ordering the affected cells to dedifferentiate back toward their
anaerobic state. The first step back is to break away from centralized
control by the higher organism _ which results in individual "tumerous"
or "uncontrolled" cells. From sustained cellular hypoxia there exists a slowly increasing
precancerous state, even years before the outbreak of physical cancer. This
precancerous state has great influence upon the "single cells" of the
organism, which includes the cells of the immune system. Thus the precancerous
state is characterized by increasing errors in, and slow weakening of, the
immune system. Arthritis and similar debilitating immune system disorders appear
to be largely the result of this "precancerous" long-term
cumulation. Note
that the most stressed cells in the body automatically provided
the greatest magnitude of "negative feedback input." Notice also
that the feedback is a phase conjugate replica; it therefore
"backtracks" its initiating stress input signal. In short, the degree
of feedback antisignal received by a cell or group of cells varies according to
the degree of stress they experienced. Thus those cells sustaining the longest
and greatest stress get this drastic dedifferentiation countersignal first.
E.g., this accounts for the (usual) localization of the resultant tumor in the
lungs of a smoker, at least initially. It also accounts for the
stress-damage mechanism for such disorders as arthritis. A
New Definition of Cancer In
the new model being advanced, cancer and
leukemia are centrally-commanded.
final, desperate. "first-step
dedifferentiation"
adaptive
attempts
by
the stressed. affected cells experiencing
sustained oxygen
shortage
(hypoxia)
to reverse their cellular evolution and return to the anaerobic stage
of their distant ancestry. The
cause of cancer and leukemia _ and indeed of all diseases _ is electromagnetic
in nature, and it can be straightforwardly treated and cured electromagnetically,
if one utilizes the extended W/Z aspects of the higher topology EM actually
written by James Clerk Maxwell. This statement is based on experimental proof;
it is not conjecture. We discuss that proof below. As
we saw, in general the strength of the cumulating countersignal inversely
depends on the distance in the body of the affected cells from the source of
greatest contaminant stimulation. As the deeper "dedifferentiation"
countersignal reaches the quantum threshold in the most affected area, a small
group of localized cells located there take the first step back along the
"singleanaerobe to single aerobe to multiple aerobe" evolutionary
chain. That first dedifferentiation step breaks the cells away from centralized
control of the MCCS in the personal quantum potential. Those dedifferentiated
cells become independent cells or a small independent cellgroupings. They
constitute a tumor, or leukemia if occurring in the blood cells. They simply are no longer
under the control of the body's MCCS in the personal quantum potential, even
though the body's logistical services (nutrients, oxygen, etc.) continue to be
furnished to them. At
this point the tumor
becomes an independent
cellular organism, living in an environment where its body host continues to
furnish its food and oxygen, and
its host's immune system cells do not recognize the altered cells as foreigners
to be attacked
and destroyed. Consequently there is no "large organism"
central control of the tumor's growth, and the tumor cells divide and multiply
apace. This loss of centralized growth control and the resulting unchecked
cellular division and replication is in fact recognized by scientists as the
major distinguishing characteristic of cancer and leukemia. With central control
lost, groups of cancer cells or individual cancer cells may break away and
travel to other locations in the body via body circulation systems. This results
in metastasis, the spread of the cancer to other sites in the body, where they
continue to be recognized as "self" by the immune system cells and continue
to be supplied with oxygen and nutrients for continued growth. The Tumor Has Become a Parasite Organization Think
of it this way: In a living body, each cell is already a single, independent,
living creature all its own. It even has its own small "personal quantum
potential" _ we have argued that that is an a
priori condition of being alive. However, each cell in a multicellular
organism normally is under a centralized electromagnetic control system (which
functions in the organism's higherlevel personal quantum potential), so that
the organism lives and functions as an overall higherlevel unit. If a cell (or
group of cells) has separated from this centralized EM control, but is still
living and functioning, then obviously the cell is no longer under the whole
organism's MCCS and personal quantum potential. However, it still possesses its
own control system, and its own The Cumulative Pre-Cancer State With
this picture of the long-term cumulative causative mechanism for cancer
and leukemia, a far better picture of the pre-cancer state has emerged.
The pre-cancer state is a hidden EM change of state comprised of a cellular
dedifferentiation order, back down the species' cellular evolution trail,
and the magnitude of that change of state is slowly increasing inside the
organism's quantum potential. The eventual observable cancer is an actual
cellular dedifferentiation due to the localized breaching of the quantum
threshold by this cumulating hidden EM dedifferentiation order to move away from
centralized control and back toward the anaerobic cellular state. Becker's
Profound Experiments It
has already been experimentally shown that very minute amounts of direct
electrical currents, e.g., can cause cellular dedifferentiation and
redifferentiation. In breathtaking work of Nobelian quality, Becker has proven
that even picoamperes of localized electrical current are sufficient to cause
cellular dedifferentiation and redifferentiation, even repetitively. Incredibly,
he proved that this was true for red blood cells, which first dedifferentiated
to more primitive cells, the redifferentiated to precursors of cartilage cells,
then redifferentiated to bone cells in a "bone fracture" area and
healed the bone fracture. Since picoamperes can be generated by the cumulative
countersignal mechanism (via Whittaker scalar interferometry), directly
affecting the MCCS and the cells as well, then the connection between scalar
potentials/potential interferometry and dedifferentiation
mechanisms assumed to be involved in cancer and leukemia essentially follows
from interpretation of Becker's pioneering work. To further strengthen the
assumption, Hsue has recently (1993) shown that a DC voltage is in fact
equivalent to two bidirectional EM traveling waves _ which directly indicates a
WZ type implication in Becker's profound work itself. Thus Becker actually
utilized a hidden, bidirectional WZ wave structure inside the voltage gradient
between his electrodes in his DC current dedifferentiation and redifferentiation
of blood cells. He conclusively demonstrated that cellular dedifferentiation and
redifferentiation _ both of them genetic changes
_ can in fact be caused by such an internal biwave EM structure of a steady,
persistent scalar potential gradient. Further, he demonstrated that these
El~-induced cellular genetic changes can be self-targeted toward
reversal of the specific
damage condition, even though several successive genetic changes may be
necessary m reach the ultimate cellular genetic form required for healing. Pre-Cancer State and Prognosis For Treatment Effectiveness To
summarize, whenever a cancer or leukemia detectably exists, regardless of the
cancer site, a pre-cancer state also exists in the remainder of the body,
and the immune system is affected generally. Further, this pre-cancer
state pre-existed the actual emergence of the tumor itself. The new EM
bioeffects model also sheds light on the probable effectiveness of conventional
treatment, and probability for a ''cure" that lasts for the rest of the
patient's life. If
the cumulative countersignal slowly kindling in the remaining pre-cancer
state is sufficiently below the quantum threshold, then conventional treatment
of the cancer _ such as excision _ can eliminate the tumor, and no other tumors
may then develop before the normal physical death Also,
we point out that many present treatments (such as nuclear radiation) themselves
cause significant stress on the body and its cells and further deterioration of
the immune system. They also generate an additional "antisignals"
level in the personal quantum potential, resulting in an actual increase in the level of the pre-cancer state in the organism.
If the combination of the pre-cancer state at time of treatment, plus the
increase in the pre-cancer state due to treatment, is sufficient to breach the
quantum level, then that treatment will
prove to be of little or no avail to the patient. The tumorous condition will
recur, and sometimes massively (the tumor metastasizes), regardless of whether
further treatment is given or not. In that case the patient will die, unless
somehow the pre-cancer state is lowered, the tumor cells are reverted back
to centralized cellular control, and the immune system is restored to effective
functioning so that excess cells are eliminated. Presently there is no
conventional treatment that is capable of accomplishing the three requirements
for a desperately ill
patient's
recovery from the "terminal" cancer condition. Seeking the Complete Cancer Cure From
the new EM definition of cancer and leukemia and the new cumulative causative
mechanism, one can see just how severely limited are the present medical weapons
against this dread disease. It follows that, if
the cause is totally electromagnetic, then a totally effective treatment can
only be sought as an electromagnetic therapy. Since the EM cause is in an
extended EM domain, then axiomatically a totally effective treatment can only be
sought in the same extended EM domain. The
complete cure for cancer and leukemia, of course, would be to completely
neutralize or "zero-out" the patient's cumulative
Whittaker/Ziolkowski countersignal buildup in the MCCS/personal QP. This can be
done prior to the cumulation reaching
the overt physical disease stage, or after
it has already reached that stage. It can readily be done
electromagnetically, using the multi-biwave tailored EM and
self-targeting to provide an exact counter-countersignal (or
antidote signal) to the cumulation signal itself. This
is a scientific
fact and it has been rigorously proven, although the methodology could not
heretofore be technically explained and understood. Priore's Cure of Terminal Tumors and Other Diseases Such
a total cancer-curative procedure was repeatedly demonstrated in live
animal experiments in the late 1960s and early 1970s by Antoine Priore in
France, under rigorous scientific protocols and supervision by eminent French
scientists [such as Robert Courrier, head of the Biology Section of the French
Academy of Science, and Secretaire
Perpetuel of the Academy at the time]. The advantage of the Priore type
approach was that it rapidly reversed the dedifferentiation away from
centralized control of the affected (tumor) cells. The tumorous cells simply
redifferentiated back to normal cells under centralized control of the
MCCS/personal QP. (If too numerous because of the tumor's growth prior to its
redifferentiation, normal body mechanisms absorb and dispose of the excess
cells). Further, such treatment removed all
the pre-cancerous state from the rest of the body, preventing
recurrence or spread of the tumor. It is the only "total cure" for
cancer, including the cumulated pre-cancer state, that has ever been scientifically
demonstrated. And lastly, it accomplished these results without severe trauma to
the body or further trauma to the immune system. Indeed, the exact opposite was
the case. Working with Priore, the eminent French scientist Pautrizel showed that the Priore
treatment restored and stimulated
the immune system back to its robust normal functioning, as would be
predicted by the present model we are proposing. Scientists at the Time Did Not Have
the Necessary Knowledge for Understanding It is a great tragedy that the active mechanism of the Priore device was not
understood _ even by Priore himself and even by very knowledgeable physicists
assigned to the program to try to ascertain the machine's mechanism. The phase
conjugate or "time-reversed" EM wave was unknown until it was
discovered in the open Soviet literature in 1972. Almost all of our knowledge of
such waves dates from that time. In the same year, two Soviet scientists briefed
American scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory on optical
phase conjugation. Thereafter, some American scientists began intense work
on optical phase conjugation. However,
the time-reversed wave is a solution to the wave equation and applies to
all kinds of waves, not just EM. Phase conjugation of sound waves, e.g., is
readily accomplished. The time-reversed wave solution actually appeared in
the scientific literature in 1898 in a paper by Barus, who pointed out that this
strange solution "made the wave run backward." But at the time the
Priore program's funding was withdrawn by the French government about
1974-75, little or no understanding of the time-reversed EM wave
existed as yet in the West, and of course the Whittaker work had always been
ignored and was unknown also. Literally,
with the technical tools available to them at the time, the French physicists,
biologists, and oncologists had no chance at all of fathoming
the causative mechanism in the Priore experiments. Nature of the Priore Treatment Briefly,
Priore mixed some 17 frequencies in a rotating plasma in a giant tube. We know
today that one function of the kind of plasma he used is to produce a phase
conjugate replica wave, for an input wave. Thus Priore unknowingly achieved
coupled wave/antiwave pairs in his device. The output of the plasma tube was
then coupled to (modulated upon) a "rippling magnetic field" of
appreciable strength. The magnetic field guaranteed penetration of the entire
body and every cell in it, carrying its modulated Whittaker/Ziolkowski internal
potential structure with it. The "ripple" in the magnetic field
guaranteed penetration to the atomic nuclei, and interaction with them, via
nuclear magnetic resonance. In turn, unknown to Priore or the scientific team,
this guaranteed the interaction of the plasma-produced W/Z structure with
the internal W/Z structure of the personal QP joining those atomic nuclei. Thus
the Priore approach (1) formed a deliberate counter-counter signal W/Z
structure; i.e., Priore constructed a specific
electromagnetic
antidote, (2) carried that antidote into all the atomic nuclei of the treated body
by nuclear magnetic resonance, and (3) caused interaction with and
neutralization of the internal W/Z dedifferentiation countersignal structure
already present in the personal QP joining all the atomic nuclei of the treated
body, zeroing out or canceling the
tumorous and pre-tumorous states existing throughout the body. The
end results were that (1) the cumulated counter-signal to the tumor cells
to dedifferentiate back toward anaerobic cells was removed, (2) the body's own
centralized cellular control over the tumor cells was restored, and (3) the
entire cumulated pre-cancer counter-signal pattern in the personal
quantum potential was removed. In short, the individual organism started over
again with a "clean slate" insofar as long-term cumulation of
cancer-inducing signals in the personal quantum potential was concerned. Furious Reaction by Orthodox French Oncologists The
Priore material, device, procedures, and results are all properly documented and
presented in the peer-reviewed French medical literature. Priore obtained
both French and U.S. patents on When
the French Government changed to a leftist government in the mid 1970s, the
implacable foes of the Priore work prevailed, and the new leftist government
withdrew all further funding. Priore later died, and that was the end of that. Of
all areas and treatments known to this researcher, the Priore approach is the
only one that has been rigorously and scientifically proven in laboratory
animals, was essentially 100% effective, and was performed under proper rigorous
scientific protocols. That it has continued to be ignored by the medical and
biological communities is a profound tragedy, but one due more to ignorance of
the active mechanisms for the treatment than of deliberate intent. There Is Also Deliberate Suppression Nevertheless,
there is also an element of deliberate suppression involved. Some years ago I
was personally involved with a special group in an effort to restore the Priore
device, when Priore was still alive. Our group obtained a tentative agreement
with both the French Government and with the Priore group. The Priore machines
were to be rebuilt in Bordeaux, France under the personal supervision of Priore
himself. Some of the scientists who had worked with him were still alive, and
would have been involved in the project. Our group had some $16 million support
pledged by some wealthy backers to fund the project. Almost
immediately after our group's successful conclusion of the tentative agreements,
the lives of all our backers and the lives of their families were threatened.
All backing was withdrawn. The leader of our group, a Nashville businessman,
came under sustained personal and business attack. He eventually lost almost
everything he had, and fled this country for his life. He is still in hiding to
this day. Antoine Priore then died and that was that. The
only part of the project that remained was my own grim determination to
eventually provide the detailed mechanism by means of which the remarkable
Priore therapeutic cures were accomplished. Success has finally been achieved
after a decade of unrelenting struggle to completely explain the cause of cancer
and the active mechanism by means of which the Priore group obtained such
astounding scientific results. I
strongly urge medical science to take a new, hard look_ both theoretically and
experimentally _ at the proven anti-cancer results obtained by Antoine
Priore and the noted scientists who worked with him. I also strongly point out
that new thinking, new theoretical tools, and new experimental instrumentation
are needed for that re-examination. In addition I have pointed out the
precise nature of the new thinking, tools, and instrumentation required. What About Other Diseases Such As AIDS? The
question now arises about other diseases, particularly AIDS. Can the expanded
Priore methodology provide equally dramatic cures of dread diseases other than
cancer and leukemia? Can it conceivably cure AIDS? The answer is a resounding
"Yes!" Almost
all disease conditions are electromagnetic in nature, in the sense of the
extended EM bioeffects model we have outlined. The basic methodology of forming
a counter-countersignal to a specific disease state can be extended to
many other diseases, and to AIDS as well. The "self-targeting"
effect in the cellular dedifferentiation induced by the extended EM methods
results in a countersignal being produced to the last major genetic change undergone by the diseased cell. In the
case of an HIV-infected cell, its genetics have been changed
(differentiated) from normal to infected. In its internal WZ structure, the
strongest resultant signal complex is thus the HIV infection differentiation
command. When pumped by the internal
bidirectional WZ wave structure
of the applied scalar potential, the
"cell-as-a-nonlinear-phase-conjugate-mirrormaterial"
generates a precisely tailored anti-AIDS
cellular genetic dedifferentiation signal. The cell thus dedifferentiates back
to a normal cell with normal genetics. In
addition to Priore's work and Becker's results, the remaining experimental
foundation for our startling statement on extended-EM reversal of AIDS was
established decades ago _ as early as the late 1950s _ by the Soviet researcher
Vlail Kaznacheyev. Implications of Kaznacheyev's Experiments In
some 17,000 experiments Kaznacheyev showed that any
cellular disease or disorder can be transmitted between cell cultures
"electromagnetically" in an unknown fashion. The model we have briefly
advanced here, if slightly extended to include the concept of the W/Z structure being
a graviton lattice
structure, is fully capable of explaining Kaznacheyev's results, the mechanisms,
etc. This EM-transmission of disease effect shown by Kaznacheyev is
known as the cytopathogenic mirror effect, and it has been replicated by
researchers at the University of Sydney in Australia, at the University of
Marburg in Germany, and by at least one researcher in the United States. In
short, what Kaznacheyev's research showed is that there exists a specific EM
signal pattern of some mysterious, not-understood nature that can induce a
specific cellular disease in a group of cells absorbing that signal pattern. If
we regard the healthy state of the cell as "condition A" and the
specific diseased state as "condition B," then specific EM signal
pattern C causes the cell to move from condition A to condition B. It
immediately follows that an antisignal to C _ that is, the phase conjugate of C,
which is a time-reversed replica of C _ will move
the diseased cell from condition B back to condition A, curing the disease. Time
reversal of "sickening" is "healing." It follows from
Kaznacheyev's work that (1) a specific signal pattern exists as the causative
inductive factor for each specific cellular disease, and (2) a specific
"antidote" signal pattern exists as the causative curative factor for
that specific disease, the antidote signal being merely the time reversal or
phase conjugate replica of the cytopathogenic signal. While Kaznacheyev never
publicly produced the cytopathogenic mechanism, such a mechanism follows from the WZ extension of EM, and the
long-term causative disease-induction mechanism I have advanced. Creating a Specific
"EM Antidote" to a Specific
Disease Consider
the cumulative EM causes of changes to a cell, including to its genetics, as a
serial chain of signals. Indeed, consider them as the layers of an onion, where
the outer layer is the most recent. Additional layers may be added to the onion
by "time forward" actions, or "differentiation" actions. If
we now wish to "peel" the onion, that too is a successive, serial
action, accomplished by "phase conjugate" or "time reversal"
operations. These result in serial cellular dedifferentiation actions. By
treating the cell and its genetics and internal parts as "highly nonlinear
material structures and therefore phase conjugate mirror materials," we can
"pump" the cell and its parts by bidirectional EM waves to convert the
cell to a pumped phase conjugate mirror (PPCM). By orthodox nonlinear phase
conjugate optics theory, with a signal wave present, the PPCM cell will
emit a
precise phase conjugate replica (PCR) wave. If we For
a diseased cell, we regard the disease as a differentiation of the cell, and the
primary cause of the differentiation (the EM cytopathogen) as a complex WZ
waveset infolded inside the personal quantum potential (in which all the body's
cells exist and in whose internal signal dynamics they participate). With the
pumped cell as a PPCM, and the EM cytopathogen present as an input signal wave
complex to the PPCM, a precise, amplified, "EM antidote" PCR
wavecomplex is emitted by the parts of the PPCM cell. Each part gets a PCR
complex signal order, dedifferentiating that part back the first step. A
diseased part steps back to a normal part. A normal part steps back to a normal
part. The diseased cell is thus dedifferentiated back to a normal cell with its
parts all normal. Because the PCR wave complex is amplified, the
dedifferentiation is must faster than was the original dedifferentiation. Thus
an HIV-infected cell that has been "dormant" for an extended
period can still be dedifferentiated back to a normal cell that is HIV-free. So
a self-targeting counter-countersignal can be automatically
"developed" and generated in the body's diseased cells, for each
specific cellular disease or disorder condition, or even for a mix of diseases
and disorders. This is accomplished by the automatic phase conjugating action of
the "cell-as-a-PPCM", when pumped by the hidden EM
bidirectional structure of a scalar potential. In practice, Priore did find it
necessary to adjust the particular frequency mixes he used for different disease
conditions. We hypothesize that this adjustment was necessary to arrive at the
proper pump wave complex that would in fact allow the proper PCR wave complex to
be emitted for a particular disease type or class. Although photobiologists
regularly report mitogenetic radiation emitted by a cell in the optical region, the effects
desired in the cells can be produced by a
different frequency regime, because of the known phenomena of nonlinear
harmonic and subharmonic resonance. Since in a W/Z structure it is the harmonic
intervals and their relative relationships that are of fundamental
importance, the frequency regime of a detected W/Z structure can be shifted
either harmonically or subharmonically. Priore, e.g., worked at radar frequencies
in the low gigahertz range. For simplicity we may think of the frequency complex
as a sort of "musical chord" composed of multiple tones. We may play
the same "chord" either on the high scale or a lower scale, and still
recognize the tune if the relative frequency interrelationships of the tones are
retained. A
Possible Simplification of Priore's Methodology If
we turn away from the classical vector/tensor EM model presently in vogue to a
higher topology EM model such as quaternions or Clifford algebra, the extended
EM bioeffects model can be mathematized and refined by experiment. For example,
Barrett has shown that the nonlinear phase conjugate optics effects can be
obtained in ordinary circuits without the use of optical
materials, when those circuits are designed and function in accord with a
higher topology EM such as quaternions. Thus the circuitry of the EM emission
devices themselves can be constructed to perform time-reversal of EM
waves, phase conjugate replicas, 4-wave mixing, and pumped phase conjugate
mirror effects, without use of normal optical materials or procedures. Priore
utilized a plasma in a giant gas-filled tube, in which to mix his 17 frequencies
and accomplish (unknown to scientists at the time) phase conjugation. Barrett's
work implies that the necessary phase conjugation, and amplification, can be
accomplished by purely electromagnetic circuitry, once the functioning of the
circuitry is designed and understood in a higher topology algebra such as
quaternions or Clifford algebra. Priore
demonstrated cures for diseases other than cancer. Different settings produced
cures for sleeping sickness, e.g. Clogging of the arteries was also completely
reversed by a variation in the Priore treatment. In addition, Pautrizel working
with Priore positively demonstrated the restoration of vigorous, natural
functioning to the immune system of the treated animal. Kaznacheyev's Viral Disease Experiments: Implications for an AIDS Cure Kaznacheyev
has already demonstrated that viral-caused diseases can be induced by
purely EM means in cell cultures. What this means is that cellular genetic
changes also are electromagnetically induced at root basis. We regard this as a
cellular differentiation. But both Becker and Priore have shown that cellular
dedifferentiation can also be induced electromagnetically, by the extended
scalar EM. It follows that viral-caused diseases _ including AIDS _ can be
cured by purely EM means, simply by creating the proper dedifferentiation signal
complex in the diseased (differentiated) cell. To determine the proper disease
induction (dedifferentiation) signal pattern for the disease, the
disease-inducing signal complex must be phase conjugated, and the phase
conjugate replica must be amplified. The phase
conjugate replica may be stimulated at the proper frequency regime by a
signal complex at a much lower frequency regime. Hence the detectable
photobiological optical cytopathogenic signal complexes may have their PCR
counterparts stimulated by irradiation with a proper signal complex at a lower
frequency regime (e.g., millimeter wave band) for use in treatment In Conclusion Again
we strongly accent that one must take the "musical" approach: A
disease pattern or a curative pattern is a complex of special frequencies and
their antiwaves, similar to a musical chord. That same chord can be played in a
higher or lower key, and the body will still determine the correct relationships
by harmonic or subharmonic oscillation. It will still
recognize the "melody" and its background chordal accompaniment;
although the individual frequencies
have changed, their relative relationships
have not changed. All
biochemistry, genetics, and cellular effects are subject to affectation and
control by proper manipulation of the W/Z structures inside scalar EM
potentials. We have stated that the living organism already utilizes the
internal EM structuring for mind, thought, and long-term memory, as well
as the master level cellular control system we have accented. For the first
time, the "software" and "firmware" of the mind appears to
be directly available, something which has never before existed in science. The
model advanced in my work is intended to point the way toward such use in
medical science on a substantial scale, to achieve healthier, more effective,
and far cheaper treatments for many of our desperate diseases that presently
require costly, protracted treatments,
often harsh and debilitating in and of themselves. We strongly believe that,
given the direct attention of the scientific community and
proper funding support, neartotal, quick, and very economical cures can be
developed for such dread diseases as cancer, leukemia, and AIDS. We point out
also that the Priore team demonstrated cure of sleeping sickness in lab animals,
as well as the direct unclogging of arteries and other blood vessels. We
also strongly accent the "self-targeting" feature when the
diseased cell is "pumped" as a phase conjugate mirror material by the
internal WZ biwave structure of an artificially-structured scalar EM
potential. The cytopathogenic disease-induction signal complex is present
in the cell and all its parts. By varying the frequencies in the internal biwave
structure of the pumping potential, and hence in the pumping of the
cell-as-a-PPCM, the cell is enabled to produce from and into
all its parts the proper phase conjugate replica wave complex for its specific
cellular disease. Hence it produces a
specific electromagnetic antidote for its own specific
disease condition. We need only adjust the frequency content of the
artificial potential until the proper PCR signal complex is produced. Further,
that PCR wave complex is amplified because of the pumping. Therefore the
"treatment time" can be very short, and need not be anywhere near as
long as the time originally required for the cytopathogenic EM signal complex to
cumulate. Today
a variety of dread diseases continue to plague humankind. Untold millions of
persons are suffering and dying, when the beginning of an effective, quick,
inexpensive therapeutic approach With
the exposition of the fundamental mechanism for this new therapeutic approach,
perhaps the scientific community will return with renewed vigor to develop this
promising area and alleviate the death and suffering so widespread today. LIST OF KEY REFERENCES Aharonov,
Y. and D. Bohm. (i959) "Significance of Electromagnetic Potentials in the
Quantum Theory," Physical Review. Second Series, Vol. 115, No. 3, p.
458491. Aitchison,
I.J.R. (1985) "Nothing's plenty: the vacuum in modern field theory." Contemporary
Physics, 26(4), p. 333-391. Amato,
Ivan. (1992) "A New Blueprint for Water's Architecture," Science, Vol.
256, Jun. 26, p. 1764. Barrett,
Terrence W. (1990a) "Maxwell's Theory Extended (Part 1)," Annales
de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, Vol. 15, No. 2, p. 143-183. Barrett,
Terrence W. (1990b) "Maxwell's Theory Extended (Part 2," Annales de
la Fondation Louis de Broglie, Vol. 15, No. 3, p. 253-283. Barrett,
T.W. (1991) "Tesla's Nonlinear Oscillator-Shuttle-Circuit (OSC)
Theory," Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, Vol. 16, No. 1,
p. 2341. Barrett,
Terrence W. (1992) "Electromagnetic Phenomena Not Explained by Maxwell's
Equations," Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie [in
publication]. Barus,
Carl. (1898) "A Curious Inversion in the Wave Mechanism of the
Electromagnetic Theory of Light," American Journal of Science, Vol.
5, Fourth Series, p. 343-348. Bearden,
T. E. (1988) "Maxwell's Original Quaternion Theory Was a Unified Field
Theory of Electromagnetics and Gravitation," Proceedings of the
International Tesla Symposium, Colorado Springs, Colorado. Bearden, T.E. (1990) A Proposed Mechanism for Noyes' Power Technology, Assoc.
Dist. Am. Sci., Huntsville, Alabama. Bearden,
T. E. and Walter Rosenthal. (199la) "On a Testable Unification of
Electromagnetics, General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics," Proceedings
of the 26th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference (IECEC
'91), Boston, Massachusetts, p. 487492. Also distributed over Internet. Bearden,
T. E. (199lb) Gravitobiology, Tesla Book Co., 1417 Second St, Suite
H-102, Coronado, California 92118. Bearden,
T. E. (1992a) "A Redefinition of the Energy Ansatz, Leading to a
Fundamentally New Class of Nuclear Interactions," Proceedings of the
27th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference (IECEC '92), Town
& Country Hotel Convention Center, San Diego, California, p. 4.3034.310. Bearden,
T.E. (1992b) An Interpretation of Whittaker's Harmonic Biwave Decomposition
of the Scalar Potential. and His Replacement of Orthodox EM Forcefield Waves
by Scalar Potential Interferometry, Assoc. Dist. Am. Sci., Huntsville,
Alabama. [In publication]. Bearden,
T.E. (1992c) EM Cytopathogenic and EM Healing Transmissions, Assoc. Dist.
Am. Sci., POB 1472, Huntsville, Alabama 35807. Bearden,
T.E. (1992d) Background for Pursuing Scalar Electromagnetics, Assoc.
Dist. Am. Sci., POB 1472, Huntsville, Alabama 35807. Distributed over Internet. Bearden,
T.E. (1992e) On the Unresolved Health Issues in Power Line Radiation and EM
Fields and Radiation: A Fundamental New Approach, Assoc. Dist. Am. Sci., POB
1472, Huntsville, Alabama 35807. Bearden, T.E. (1993a) "The Final Secret of Free Energy," Assoc. Dist.
Am. Sci., POB 1472, Huntsville, Alabama 35807. Distributed over Internet. Bearden,
T.E. (1993b) "Mechanism for Long-Term Cumulative Biological Effects
of EM Radiation," Presented to the 70th Annual Meeting of the Alabama Academy of Science, University of Alabama at Huntsville, March 25, 1993. Becker, Robert and Gary Selden. (1985) The Body Electric, William Morrow and
Company, New York. Belyaev,
B.N. (1980) "On Random Fluctuations of the Velocity of Light in
Vacuum." Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykj Zavendin. Fiyska (11). Nov.
1980. p. 3742. [In Russian] Besancon,
Robert M., Ed. (1974). The Encyclopedia of Physics, 2nd Edn., Van
Nostrand and Reinhold, New York, p. 729-731. Bird,
Christopher. (1988) "The Case of Antoine Priore and His Therapeutic
Machine: A Scandal in the Politics of Science," Appendix I in T.E. Bearden, AIDS:
Biological Warfare, Tesla Book Co., Chula Vista, California. Bohm,
David. (1952) Physical Review, Vol. 85, p. 166, 180. Bohm,
David. (1980) Wholeness and the Implicate Order, Routledge & Kegan
Paul, Ltd., London. Boyer,
Timothy H. (1975) "Random electrodynamics: the theory of classical
electrodynamics with classical electromagnetic zero-point radiation."
Phvsical Review D. Particles and Fields. Series 32. 11(4). February
15, 1975. p. 790-808. Boyer,
Timothy H. (1985) "The Classical Vacuum." Scientific American. Aug.
1985. Casimir,
H.B.G. (1953) "Introductory results in quantum electrodynamics." Physics
(19). p. 846-849. Davies,
Paul C.W. (1982) "Something for Nothing." New Scientist. 94(1307).
May 27, 1982. p. 580-582. Dirac, P.A.M. (1930) "A theory of
electrons and protons." Proceedings of the Royal Society Elyntin, P.V. (1988) "The Quantum Chaos
Problem," Sov. Phys. Usp., Vol. 31, No. 7, p. Feynman,
Richard P., Robert B. Leighton and Matthew Sands. (1963) The Feynman Lectures
on Physics, Addison-Wesley, New York, Vol. I. Fulcher,
Lewis P., Johann Rafelske, and Abraham Klein. (1979). "The decay of the
vacuum." Scientific American. 241(6). December, 1979. p.
150-159. Graham,
G.M. and d.G. OLahoz. (1980) "Observation of static electromagnetic
momentum in vacuo." Nature. 285(5761). May 1980. p. 154-5. Greenberg,
Jack S. and Walter Grenier. (1982) "Search for the sparking of the
vacuum." Physics Today. August, 1982. p. 24-32. Hiley,
B.J. and F. David Peat. (1987) "General Introduction: The Development of
David Bohm's Ideas From the Plasma to the Implicate Order," B.J. Hitey and
F. David Peat, Eds. Quantum Implications: Essays in Honour of David Bohm, Routtedge
& Kegan Paul, London. Hsue,
C.W. (1993) "A DC Voltage is Equivalent to Two Traveling Waves on a
Lossless Nonuniform Transmission Line," IEEE Microwave and Guided Wave
Letters, Vol. 3, p. 82-84. Ignatovich,
V.K. (1989) "The Remarkable Capabilities of Recursive Relations," American
Journal of Physics, Vol. 57, No. 10, p. 873-878. Jackiw, R. and J.R. Schrieffer. (1981)
"The decay of the vacuum." Nuclear Physics B. Vol. Jackson,
J.D. (1975) Classical Electrodynamics, 2nd Edn., John Wiley & Sons,
New York. Kaznacheyev,
Vlail and L.P. Mikhailova. (1981) Ultraweak Radiation in Intercellular
Interactions, [in Russian], Novosibirsk. Kaznacheyev,
Vlail. (1982) "EIectromagnetic Bioinformation in Intercellular
Interactions," Psi Research, p. 47-76. Kervran,
Louis. (1982) Transmutations a Faible Energie (Naturelles et Biologiques), Maloine
S.A., Paris. Kidd,
Richard et al. (1989) "Evolution of the Modern Photon," American
Journal of Physics Vol. 57, No. 1, p. 27-35. Lee,
T.D. (1981) Particle Physics and Introduction to Field Theory, Harwood,
New York Chapter 25: Outlook, "Possibility of Vacuum Engineering," p.
824-828. Lindsay,
Robert Bruce and Henry Margenau. (1963) Foundations of Physics, Dover
Publications, New York. Maxwell,
James Clerk. (1873) A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, Oxford
University Press, Oxford. Misner,
W., K.S. Thorne and J.A. Wheeler. (1973) Gravitation, W.H. Freeman and
Co., San Francisco, p. 399; 1191. Ohno,
M. and K. Takagi. (1992) "Schlieren Visualization of Acoustic Phase
Conjugate Waves Generated by Nonlinear Electroacoustic Interaction in
LiNbO3," Applied Phvsics Letters, Vol. Pool Robert. (1989) "Quantum Chaos:
Enigma Wrapped in a Mystery," Science, Vol. 243, p. Popp,
Fritz Albert. (1979) "Photon Storage in Biological Systems," in Fritz
Albert Popp et al, eds., Electromagnetic Bio-Information: Proceedings of
the Symposium. Marburg. Federal Republic of Germany. Sep. 5. 1977; Urban
& Schwarzenberg, Baltimore, p. 123-149. Prange, Richard E. and Peter Strance (1984)
"The superconducting vacuum" American Puthoff,
Harold E. (1987) "Ground State of Hydrogen as a
Zero-Point-Fluctuation-Determined State." Physical Review
D. 35(10). May 15, 1987. p. 3266-3269. Puthoff,
Harold E (1989a) "Gravity as
a Zero-Point-Fluctuation Force " Physical Review A Puthoff, Harold E. (1989b) "Source of
Vacuum Electromagnetic Zero-Point Energy, Physical Puthoff,
Harold E. (1991) "The energetic vacuum: implications for energy
research." Speculations in Science and Technology. 13(3). p.
247-257. Rorvik, David M. (1975) "Do the French
Have a Cure for Cancer?" Esquire, July 1975, p. Sachs, Robert G. (1987) The Physics of Time
Reversal, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Sakharov, A.D. (1968) "Vacuum Quantum
Fluctuations in Curved Space and the Theory of Gravitation," Sov. Phys.
Dokl., Vol. 12, p. 1040. Schwarzschild, Bertram. (1986) "Currents
in Normal-metal Rings Exhibit Aharonov-Bohm Effect," Physics Today, Vol.
39, No. 1, p. 17-20. Sheldrake, Rupert. (1981) A New Science of
Life: The Hypothesis of Formative Causation, Blond & Briggs, Ltd., U.S.
reprint, J.P. Tarcher, Inc., Los Angeles, 1982. Stoney, G. J. (1897) "XLVIII. On a
Supposed Proof of a Theorem in Wave‑motion, To the Editors of the
Philosophical Magazine," Philosoph. Magazine, 5(43), p. 368-373. Strand, J. (1986) "Photons in Introductory Quantum Physics," American Journal of Physics. Vol. 54, No. 7, p. 650-652. Sweet,
Floyd and
T. E. Bearden. (1991) "Utilizing Scalar Electromagnetics to Tap Vacuum
Energy,~ Proceedings of the 26th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering
Conference (IECEC '91), Boston, Massachusetts, p. 370-375. Distributed over
Internet. Tesla, Nikola. (1932) "Pioneer Radio Engineer Gives Views on Power," New York Herald Tribune, Sep. 11, 1932. Thompson,
Mark. (1989) "Mixed Signals May Have
Misguided U.S. Weapons," The Washington Post, Jan. 22,
1989, p. A4. Wheeler,
John Archibald. (1968) "Superspace and the nature of quantum
geometrodynamics." In: Topics in Non-linear Physics, Edited by
Normal J. Zabusky. Springer-Verlag. 1968. p. 642. Whittaker,
E.T. (1903) "On the Partial Differential Equations of Mathematical
Physics," Mathematische Annalen, Vol. 57, p. 333-355. Whittaker,
E.T. (1904) "On an Expression of the Electromagnetic Field Due to Electrons
by Means of Two Scalar Potential Functions," Proceedings of the London
Mathematical Society, Series 2,
Vol. 1, p. 367-372. Ziolkowski,
Richard W. (1985) "Exact Solutions of the Wave Equation With Complex Source
Locations," Journal of Mathematical Physics, Vol. 26, p. 861. Ziolkowski,
Richard W. (1989a) "Localized Transmission of Wave Energy," Proc.
SPIE. Vol. 1061. Microwave and Particle Beam Sources and Directed Energy
Concepts. p. 396-397. Ziolkowski,
Richard W. (1989b) "Localized Transmission of Electromagnetic Energy,"
Physical Review A, Vol. 39, p. 2005. Ziolkowski,
Richard W. (1989c) "Localized Transmission of Wave Energy," Proc.
SPIE. Vol. 1061. Microwave and Particle Beam Sources and Directed Energy Concepts. p. 396-397. Ziolkowski,
Richard W. (1992a) "Localized Wave Transmission Physics and
Engineering," Physical Review A (in Press). Ziolkowski,
Richard W. (1992c) "Properties of Electromagnetic Beams Generated by UltraWide
Bandwidth Pulse-Driven Arrays, IEEE Trans. Ant. Prop. (Submitted). Ziolkowski,
Richard W., Amr M. Shaarawi, and Ioannis M. Besieris. (1989) Nuclear Physics B
(Proc. Suppl.), Vol. 6, p. 255-258. Ziolkowski,
R. W. and Lewis, D.K. (1990) "Verification of the Localized Wave
Transmission Effect," Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 68, p. 6083. |
E)(+