tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post5052441134851322762..comments2017-04-13T04:47:21.148-06:00William N. Grigghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14368220509514750246noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-30328859745466050962007-01-15T13:28:00.000-07:002007-01-15T13:28:00.000-07:00hiveradical,<br /><br />i must disagree with you. ron paul is looking into running for president. ha has no baggage, and has for years said the same thing over and over. he has never flip flopped, and having brought over 4,000 souls into this world, i'm sure he's not the kind that enjoys making souls leave this realm...like some politicians have no qualm in doing.rickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12473173027048173880noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-23004340301740788152007-01-15T01:12:00.000-07:002007-01-15T01:12:00.000-07:00There's not a significant presidential political candidate, in either party, that you can point to that has less baggage then Romney. And as your blog post makes obvious, that's saying something.<br /><br />Politics is relative. The public determines what the bounds of the acceptable spectrum of relative egregiousness vs. acceptability are. And they do so by choosing the degree of their own collective ethics and their own collective introspection and interest in the welfare of the nation and the world.<br /><br />Romney is the least baggage laden of all viable contenders in view. One can face it or deny it.HiveRadicalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16226311151632269007noreply@blogger.com