Comments on Pro Libertate: Nullifying the Jury

Think about this, isn't telling the jury what ...

2016-02-01T10:29:34.466-07:00

Think about this, isn't telling the jury what the law is influencing their decision? And not telling them what the punishment is, taking away the conscience of the community? Statutes, codes and regulations are not common law. The Magna Carta is the basis of common law. For every injury there must be remedy and for every crime there must be a victim and the state can not be a victim.

HEY WILL- LIKE YOUR ARTICALS, BUT YOUR BIG COLLAGE...

2016-01-31T20:52:52.542-07:00

HEY WILL- LIKE YOUR ARTICALS, BUT YOUR BIG COLLAGE EDUMACATED WORDS IN THEM SUCK.

I like the views of the posters on the legal syste...

2016-01-21T19:57:50.457-07:00

I like the views of the posters on the legal system in regards to the criminal justice scam. It's pretty much a do as I say, not as I do system. Clearly on display is that the scam is one sided and equal protection is a complete and total scam. And think what would the likelihood be for a person to be able to have a serious and fair civil trial at suing government under the second 13th Amendment as a slave or a bondage prisoner with taxes taking more than half of their income, however income Is defined. That is a key question, which we will never see.

one must kowtow to authority. those who refuse ...

2016-01-21T14:49:11.073-07:00

one must kowtow to authority.

those who refuse are fed to the prison complex for 'reeducation', as if labeling it such distinguishes it from something 'the other side' does, ie, punish for actions that injure neither person, nor property, but, rather, challenge a fetid order that relies on authority and utterly ridiculous 'laws' to maintain the status quo the authorities benefit from.

the 'legal' system constitutes the nuts and bolts of how this is done.

roland freisler (small letters intended), contrary to what many believe, is actually alive and well

My one tiny criticism of your excellent piece woul...

2016-01-21T08:02:59.930-07:00

My one tiny criticism of your excellent piece would be that it is most likely a mistake, a misreading of the situation to ascribe the cause of the actions taken by the prosecutor to the presence of moral failing. Rather I think one finds that the fundamental purpose of the judiciary going back to the middle ages following the end of the Carolingian era, has been to keep the proletariat, for lack of a better word, in line.
The whole form of state justice, according to Michel Foucault, from that time on has been constructed as a bulwark against seditious activity, against revolution. The creation of police, the invention of the prosecutor, the power seized by and arrogated to the judge are all part of the same system assembled to quickly squelch 'resistance' to control by a political elite. And in fact this very case begins with an individual waging a protest against taxation. The police evidently quickly intervene, quickly ensnare the protester on some petty offence. The more the protestor protests the whole thing the more the judicial system comes down on him. Now I don't think this is at all necessarily because of any moral failings on the part of the individuals occupying positions within the judicial system. Rather one must look to the medieval Western European political roots of the system, its
anti-seditional origins above and beyond its advertised function of securing a disinterested neutral 'justice', to understand it.

Humor -- it is a difficult concept. It is not logi...

2016-01-20T23:09:48.628-07:00

Humor -- it is a difficult concept. It is not logical.

(Mr. Tribble is a Trekkie, not surprisingly.)

Not to make light of Mr. Townsend's situation,...

2016-01-20T22:57:04.787-07:00

Not to make light of Mr. Townsend's situation, but I'm sure the judge knew in advance there would be Trouble with Tribbles.

Today's headlines are the city of LA is going ...

2016-01-20T17:07:10.545-07:00

Today's headlines are the city of LA is going to settle with millions with people whom were wrongly convicted and spent years in prison. The people in government send away innocent people all the time to prison and knowingly.
This case is yet another perfect example, that shows the people in the government are not what many would call, people of decent character.