NavigationBanners
Active forum topicsRecent blog postsUser loginWho's new
Who's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 1672 guests online.
|
Add new commentThrow the Ring into the VolcanoSubmitted by Bill St. Clair on Fri, 2002-02-01 09:06.
Steve Trinward at Rational Review -
Who are we trying to elect? A critique of the "electability" political
model - good exploration of why electing candidates is not an
effective way to achieve a libertarian society.
Okay, now put our "typical" libertarian in this context. Most libertarians do not by nature enjoy the civic organizational involvement it takes to develop a reputation with those likely to come out and help in an election effort. No, they'd rather be home cleaning their guns, or writing their treatises, or chatting on discussion e-lists, or ... anything else! Vin Suprynowicz - California devalues 'dollar' coupons by another 8 percent - part of The Libertarian series. Vin bemoans California's 19th raise in their minimum wage. As well he should. Meantime, hasn't anyone ever asked why they have to keep doing this every year or two, like rats on a treadmill? Because it doesn't last long, you see. If an hour of unskilled labor is now "worth" seven so-called "dollars" instead of six, all that must really happen, in the end, is that a lot more fiat paper coupons still identified as "dollars" will have to be printed. (See: "Weimar Republic.")
David E. Sanger at The New York Times -
Bush, on Offense, Says He'll Fight to Keep Tax Cuts The Libertarian Enterprise has a new issue, "The Bright and the Bleak". Articles I liked:
add new comment | quote | 1106 reads
Reply |
BlogrollFirearm NewsQuotesEvery man, woman, and responsible child has an unalienable individual, civil, Constitutional, and human right to obtain, own, and carry, openly or concealed, any weapon -- rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- any time, any place, without asking anyone's permission. -- L. Neil Smith Reread that pesky first clause of the Second Amendment. It doesn't say what any of us thought it said. What it says is that infringing the right of the people to keep and bear arms is treason. What else do you call an act that endangers "the security of a free state"? And if it's treason, then it's punishable by death. I suggest due process, speedy trials, and public hangings. -- L. Neil Smith Based on 253 journal articles, 99 books, 43 government publications, and some of its own empirical work, the panel couldn't identify a single gun control regulation that reduced violent crime, suicide or accidents. -- John Lott, commenting on the National Academy of Sciences report (PDF) on gun control laws Zero Aggression Principle ("Zap") "A libertarian is a person who believes that no one has the right, under any circumstances, to initiate force against another human being, or to advocate or delegate its initiation. Those who act consistently with this principle are libertarians, whether they realize it or not. Those who fail to act consistently with it are not libertarians, regardless of what they may claim." -- L. Neil Smith Formerly called the "Non-Aggression Principle", or "NAP" Why Did It Have to be... Guns? Make no mistake: all politicians -- even those ostensibly on the side of guns and gun ownership -- hate the issue and anyone, like me, who insists on bringing it up. They hate it because it's an X-ray machine. It's a Vulcan mind-meld. It's the ultimate test to which any politician -- or political philosophy -- can be put. If a politician isn't perfectly comfortable with the idea of his average constituent, any man, woman, or responsible child, walking into a hardware store and paying cash -- for any rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- without producing ID or signing one scrap of paper, he isn't your friend no matter what he tells you. If he isn't genuinely enthusiastic about his average constituent stuffing that weapon into a purse or pocket or tucking it under a coat and walking home without asking anybody's permission, he's a four-flusher, no matter what he claims. What his attitude -- toward your ownership and use of weapons -- conveys is his real attitude about you. And if he doesn't trust you, then why in the name of John Moses Browning should you trust him? -- L. Neil Smith The state can only survive as long as a majority is programmed to believe that theft isn't wrong if it's called taxation or asset forfeiture or eminent domain, that assault and kidnapping isn't wrong if it's called arrest, that mass murder isn't wrong if it's called war. -- Bill St. Clair Monthly ArchivesTTLB |
Recent comments
1 day 17 hours ago
2 days 22 hours ago
2 days 23 hours ago
1 week 1 hour ago
1 week 3 days ago
1 week 3 days ago
1 week 5 days ago
1 week 5 days ago
2 weeks 6 days ago
3 weeks 4 days ago