Add new comment

Submitted by David Gross (not verified) on Tue, 2009-06-23 09:19.

Is there any evidence at all that the Chinese practiced nonviolent resistance, much less an organized, nation-wide satyagraha campaign, against the Japanese invasion? None at all. They tried to violently resist and failed. So your commentator equates failing at violent resistance and then surrendering with conducting organized nonviolent resistance, in order to prove the point that a satyagraha campaign is equivalent to laying one's head passively on the butcher block.

The idea that nonviolent resistance only worked in India because the British raj was so civilized and restrained is also hogwash. Historians are still debating whether the British massacred millions or merely hundreds of thousands of Indians following the Sepoy Mutiny, for instance.

Reply



The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


*

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <i> <b> <u>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see interwiki.
  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see interwiki.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
  • You can use BBCode tags in the text, URLs will be automatically converted to links
Verify comment authorship
Captcha Image: you will need to recognize the text in it.
*
Please type in the letters/numbers that are shown in the image above.