Add new comment

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 2006-05-14 14:30.

You are right, the survivor gets to tell the story. At this point who really knows for sure what happened in this case, other than the two police officers?

I do know, from talking to Michael's sister that "the facts have changed since the original meeting with police".

There have been discussions about how officers routinely "pat down" people and why would Michael agree to a "pat down" after having said he did not have a gun, and knowing a pat down would reveal he did have one.

Some things are just fishy.

Reply



The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


*

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <i> <b> <u>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see interwiki.
  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see interwiki.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
  • You can use BBCode tags in the text, URLs will be automatically converted to links
Verify comment authorship
Captcha Image: you will need to recognize the text in it.
*
Please type in the letters/numbers that are shown in the image above.