NavigationBanners
Active forum topicsRecent blog postsUser loginWho's new
Who's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 1142 guests online.
|
Add new commentHenderson Thirteenth GradeSubmitted by Bill St. Clair on Sun, 2002-02-10 08:18.
FROM MOUNTAIN MEDIA
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE DATED FEB. 6, 2002 THE LIBERTARIAN, By Vin Suprynowicz 'Henderson Thirteenth Grade' When do sponsors of Hooterville U. take off their clothes and paint themselves? The proposed site of the still imaginary Nevada State College at Henderson -- the largest suburb of Las Vegas -- was relocated last year from a traditional-style campus at the entrance to an upscale master-planned community near the center of town to an industrial park off Car Country Drive, whose sole tenant complains he was promised more than discarded mattresses and the whine of off-road motorbikes. The outfit's highly-paid "founding president" now admits he worried last fall the college project was "dead" due to lackluster private donations. (Taxpayers were once promised private backers would fund the whole project, which is based on the premise that Nevada needs more government-school teachers, and not necessarily of the high caliber now produced at UNLV.) Well, the good news just keeps pouring in for this still-imaginary hole in the ground, into which influential Henderson state legislator Richard Perkins has so far managed to pour about a million tax dollars. By this time of year, the University of Nevada Las Vegas has received about one-fifth of the applications for incoming freshmen which it expects to receive for the class of 2006 -- 2,000 applications to date, in fact. But it turns out the proposed new Hooterville U., less than eight months away from opening its doors, has so far received applications from, um ... 10 to 15 students. Never at a loss for words, founding college president Richard Moore -- apparently a fan of John Barth's "The Sot-Weed Factor" -- explained to university regents at their Jan. 25 meeting that he actually wishes no students had applied at all: He would prefer that prospective applicants wait till he can provide more specific details about the nursing and teacher-training curricula he hopes to offer. NSCH doesn't even have a catalog or a class schedule yet, and "We're not in an application drive," Mr. Moore demurred. Although that particular spin dance would seem to contradict the signals being sent by the nascent college's own Web site, which now encourages would-be scholars to rush in their applications with a promise to waive a $40 fee which -- so far as can be determined -- never existed in the first place. For the record, if the proposed campus were to open with 15 students, the proposed $1 million start-up cost would work out to $66,000 per kid. Mr. Moore's own modest $182,000 salary would mean taxpayers would be paying him $12,100 (not counting benefits) for the supervision of each student. Even if the eventual applicant pool does grow by a factor of five -- and assuming every applicant is accepted -- 50 to 75 students would fit in a one-room schoolhouse. At that point, wouldn't it be more appropriate to call Mr. Moore's current project "Henderson Thirteenth Grade"? Yes, the recruiting drive Mr. Moore promises for April could doubtless drum up the 500 students he's planning for -- assuming he doesn't balk at hanging fliers on apartment doors and slipping them under windshield wipers at the supermarket. But what will then have happened to the notion that high "demand" justifies the allocation of scarce state revenues to this project -- and what will become then of the pretense that "high standards" are being maintained? Mr. Moore is a great PR man -- he spent part of the Jan. 25 Regents meeting boosting the motivation of his employers by showing them clips from the inspirational film "Chariots of Fire." But behind all the flummoxry, the suspicion lingers that the educratic wolves have gathered here to feed off this succulent, newborn calf irrespective of whether it is ever to rise to its feet. Part-time instructors at Nevada colleges and universities receive $2,000 per semester of teaching, but Mr. Moore explained to the Regents he has to pay Clark County Associate Superintendent of Human Resources George Ann Rice $1,000 per day for "consulting work" because she's "a national scholar" ... whatever that means. If this were a Mark Twain novel, it's about now that the villagers would be arriving for the third night's performance of the Duke and Dauphin (who promise readings from Shakespeare but end up crawling about on stage, naked and painted with colorful spots) carrying tar, feathers, and bags of rotten fruit. But of course, the Duke and the Dauphin never show up for the third night.
Vin Suprynowicz is assistant editorial page editor of the Las Vegas Review-Journal, and the author of "Send in the Waco Killers." Subscribe to his monthly newsletter at Privacy Alert, 561 Keystone Ave., Suite 684, Reno, NV 89503 -- or dialing 775-348-8591, where information on his next book, "The Ballad of Carl Drega," is also available.
Vin Suprynowicz, vin@lvrj.com "When great changes occur in history, when great principles are involved, as a rule the majority are wrong. The minority are right." -- Eugene V. Debs (1855-1926) "The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed -- and thus clamorous to be led to safety -- by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary." -- H.L. Mencken add new comment | quote | 907 reads
Reply |
BlogrollFirearm NewsQuotesEvery man, woman, and responsible child has an unalienable individual, civil, Constitutional, and human right to obtain, own, and carry, openly or concealed, any weapon -- rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- any time, any place, without asking anyone's permission. -- L. Neil Smith Reread that pesky first clause of the Second Amendment. It doesn't say what any of us thought it said. What it says is that infringing the right of the people to keep and bear arms is treason. What else do you call an act that endangers "the security of a free state"? And if it's treason, then it's punishable by death. I suggest due process, speedy trials, and public hangings. -- L. Neil Smith Based on 253 journal articles, 99 books, 43 government publications, and some of its own empirical work, the panel couldn't identify a single gun control regulation that reduced violent crime, suicide or accidents. -- John Lott, commenting on the National Academy of Sciences report (PDF) on gun control laws Zero Aggression Principle ("Zap") "A libertarian is a person who believes that no one has the right, under any circumstances, to initiate force against another human being, or to advocate or delegate its initiation. Those who act consistently with this principle are libertarians, whether they realize it or not. Those who fail to act consistently with it are not libertarians, regardless of what they may claim." -- L. Neil Smith Formerly called the "Non-Aggression Principle", or "NAP" Why Did It Have to be... Guns? Make no mistake: all politicians -- even those ostensibly on the side of guns and gun ownership -- hate the issue and anyone, like me, who insists on bringing it up. They hate it because it's an X-ray machine. It's a Vulcan mind-meld. It's the ultimate test to which any politician -- or political philosophy -- can be put. If a politician isn't perfectly comfortable with the idea of his average constituent, any man, woman, or responsible child, walking into a hardware store and paying cash -- for any rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- without producing ID or signing one scrap of paper, he isn't your friend no matter what he tells you. If he isn't genuinely enthusiastic about his average constituent stuffing that weapon into a purse or pocket or tucking it under a coat and walking home without asking anybody's permission, he's a four-flusher, no matter what he claims. What his attitude -- toward your ownership and use of weapons -- conveys is his real attitude about you. And if he doesn't trust you, then why in the name of John Moses Browning should you trust him? -- L. Neil Smith The state can only survive as long as a majority is programmed to believe that theft isn't wrong if it's called taxation or asset forfeiture or eminent domain, that assault and kidnapping isn't wrong if it's called arrest, that mass murder isn't wrong if it's called war. -- Bill St. Clair Monthly ArchivesTTLB |
Recent comments
1 day 4 hours ago
2 days 9 hours ago
2 days 10 hours ago
6 days 12 hours ago
1 week 3 days ago
1 week 3 days ago
1 week 4 days ago
1 week 4 days ago
2 weeks 5 days ago
3 weeks 4 days ago