NavigationBanners
Active forum topicsRecent blog postsUser loginWho's new
Who's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 1531 guests online.
|
Add new commentShould Nevada borrow tax structures of the states everyone is fleeing?Submitted by Bill St. Clair on Wed, 2001-12-26 06:34.
FROM MOUNTAIN MEDIA
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE DATED DEC. 16, 2001 THE LIBERTARIAN, By Vin Suprynowicz Should Nevada borrow tax structures of the states everyone is fleeing? Here in Nevada, the Governor's Task Force on Tax Policy held its first meeting Wednesday, and it's already clear Chairman Guy Hobbs will have his hands full reining in those who see this as an opportunity to hand the state bureaucrats a new blank check to "Spend, spend, spend." Mandalay Resort Group Vice President Mike Sloan -- a task force member -- cited "repeated studies" purportedly showing "The state is going to have a budgetary imbalance at some point if we rely on a narrow tax base" (the favored euphemism of the hour for "not enough loot.") The casino boss then adds that there's a "growing sense" the state is failing to meet educational and health care "needs." But the perceived "needs" of those who seek free schooling, food, shelter, and health care can never be "met," of course. Set up a table offering "free sandwiches," and see whether anyone ever says, "No thanks, I've had enough." The flaw here can be traced back to the Assembly Concurrent Resolution which called this task force into being -- a pretty good imitation of the piteous sound issuing from a basketful of blind and hungry kittens, penned by Assemblywoman Chris Giunchigliani and launching into blatant falsehood by the time it gets to its 28th word, where this entertaining document asserts "The rate of growth of Nevada's population is much faster than the rate of growth of its public revenue." (In fact, any schoolchild capable of working out percentages can determine that, since 1987, state revenue growth has exceeded what would be necessary to compensate for population growth and inflation combined in every year but one.) The task force is then instructed to determine "optimal tax rates" by a set of politicians who refuse to admit that even 90 percent rates should be disallowed, in a resolution that rounds off with repeated euphemistic calls to "broaden the tax base" and "stabilize the tax base" ... echoing nary a word of Mr. Madison's stern warning that "No capitation, or other direct, tax shall be laid," nor Mr. Jefferson's sage advice that government must not "take the bread from the mouth of labor." Instead, emulating the classic Roger Corman film, it's all "Feed me, feed me!" From this starting point, it should come as no surprise that commission members were soon suggesting Nevada model its tax structure on those of other states. "Where do people find revenues in the other 49 states?" asked Mr. Sloan, ignoring the fact that Nevada's 38 percent reliance on a gaming tax could render such comparisons considerably misleading (or does Mr. Sloan mean to suggest that we should adopt their prohibitions, as well?) The task force should look into the tax structures of "Ten states with better quality of life and ask them about their situation," echoed Henderson real estate heir Brian Greenspun, also a task force member. Apparently Mr. Greenspun is unaware that most Nevadans were not born here, but rather moved here on purpose. It is therefore reasonable to assume that many would agree there are no other states with a "better quality of life," or they would have moved there ... especially if freedom (including the freedom to keep what we earn) is placed at or near the top of the list of "qualities" sought, considerably above "better recycling programs" and "free cheese." This nation was built on two powerful notions: that government at any level should have limited powers -- not a blank check to raise as much revenue as necessary to "meet everyone's needs" -- and secondly on a notion called "federalism," which meant that aside from their cooperative efforts on a small number of matters they could not handle alone (like raising a Navy), the several states would remain sovereign and free to do things differently, facing would-be tyrants with the prospect of free citizens merely "voting with their feet," moving to a freer, lower-tax environment any time they desired. Why do the task force members think Nevada -- where residents pay no state income tax and are free to own machine guns and carry pistols and smoke in taverns and frequent casinos and bordellos -- is the fastest growing state in the union? If New York or California tax their citizens at twice the rate of Nevada, in order to offer such "services" as additional "code enforcement officers" to protect endangered rats and block home-building and leaf-blowing and outdoor smoking and barbecue grilling, then those who prefer such a level of "service" should simply be advised to move there. If they reply that they can't find work there, or affordable housing, the correct might be: "Gee, that sounds almost like they're doing something wrong, and we're doing something right ... doesn't it?" Before they go much further down this path, Mr. Hobbs might want to assign his task force some homework, starting with Friedrich Hayek's "The Road to Serfdom"; Walter Williams' "More Liberty Means Less Government"; and Canadian historian Charles Adams' "Those Dirty Rotten Taxes: The Tax Revolts that Built America" ... perhaps winding up with New York Timesman Henry Hazlitt's classic "Economics in One Lesson." Book reports due Jan. 16.
Vin Suprynowicz is assistant editorial page editor of the Las Vegas Review-Journal and the author of "Send in the Waco Killers". Subscribe to his monthly newsletter by sending $72 to Privacy Alert, 561 Keystone Ave., Suite 684, Reno, NV 89503 -- or dialing 775-348-8591.
Vin Suprynowicz, vin@lvrj.com "When great changes occur in history, when great principles are involved, as a rule the majority are wrong. The minority are right." -- Eugene V. Debs (1855-1926) "The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed -- and thus clamorous to be led to safety -- by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary." -- H.L. Mencken add new comment | quote | 1006 reads
Reply |
BlogrollFirearm NewsQuotesEvery man, woman, and responsible child has an unalienable individual, civil, Constitutional, and human right to obtain, own, and carry, openly or concealed, any weapon -- rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- any time, any place, without asking anyone's permission. -- L. Neil Smith Reread that pesky first clause of the Second Amendment. It doesn't say what any of us thought it said. What it says is that infringing the right of the people to keep and bear arms is treason. What else do you call an act that endangers "the security of a free state"? And if it's treason, then it's punishable by death. I suggest due process, speedy trials, and public hangings. -- L. Neil Smith Based on 253 journal articles, 99 books, 43 government publications, and some of its own empirical work, the panel couldn't identify a single gun control regulation that reduced violent crime, suicide or accidents. -- John Lott, commenting on the National Academy of Sciences report (PDF) on gun control laws Zero Aggression Principle ("Zap") "A libertarian is a person who believes that no one has the right, under any circumstances, to initiate force against another human being, or to advocate or delegate its initiation. Those who act consistently with this principle are libertarians, whether they realize it or not. Those who fail to act consistently with it are not libertarians, regardless of what they may claim." -- L. Neil Smith Formerly called the "Non-Aggression Principle", or "NAP" Why Did It Have to be... Guns? Make no mistake: all politicians -- even those ostensibly on the side of guns and gun ownership -- hate the issue and anyone, like me, who insists on bringing it up. They hate it because it's an X-ray machine. It's a Vulcan mind-meld. It's the ultimate test to which any politician -- or political philosophy -- can be put. If a politician isn't perfectly comfortable with the idea of his average constituent, any man, woman, or responsible child, walking into a hardware store and paying cash -- for any rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- without producing ID or signing one scrap of paper, he isn't your friend no matter what he tells you. If he isn't genuinely enthusiastic about his average constituent stuffing that weapon into a purse or pocket or tucking it under a coat and walking home without asking anybody's permission, he's a four-flusher, no matter what he claims. What his attitude -- toward your ownership and use of weapons -- conveys is his real attitude about you. And if he doesn't trust you, then why in the name of John Moses Browning should you trust him? -- L. Neil Smith The state can only survive as long as a majority is programmed to believe that theft isn't wrong if it's called taxation or asset forfeiture or eminent domain, that assault and kidnapping isn't wrong if it's called arrest, that mass murder isn't wrong if it's called war. -- Bill St. Clair Monthly ArchivesTTLB |
Recent comments
1 day 15 hours ago
2 days 21 hours ago
2 days 22 hours ago
1 week 17 min ago
1 week 3 days ago
1 week 3 days ago
1 week 5 days ago
1 week 5 days ago
2 weeks 6 days ago
3 weeks 4 days ago