NavigationBanners
Active forum topicsRecent blog postsUser loginWho's new
Who's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 1306 guests online.
|
Add new commentHate Crimes in New YorkSubmitted by Bill St. Clair on Fri, 2003-01-31 03:26.
by Bill St. Clair
<bill@billstclair.com>
[This was published in The Libertarian Enterprise]
I heard that the New York senate has passed hate crime legislation. How silly of them. If Peter is alleged to have killed Paul, it makes sense to me that a judge and jury can decide whether that is true beyond a reasonable doubt and whether it is also true beyond a reasonable doubt that Peter was not acting in self defense. I don't see how they can determine why Peter killed Paul, unless they can read minds. Still, it seems that hate crime legislation is all the rage nowadays, and Mr. Silver will probably pass it on to Governor Pataki, who is already on record as being ready to sign it. So, now that "we" have decided that there is such a thing as a hate crime, let's talk about one of the biggest hate crimes in the history of the nation, the drug laws, and one of the biggest hate crimes in the history of New York, the Rockefeller drug laws. People who ingest plants and chemicals typically do so in the privacy of their own homes. They do not directly hurt anyone but themselves. The sale of plants and chemicals is typically a transaction between consenting adults. There is no violence, theft, or fraud here. Hence, no crime has taken place. As soon as a police officer breaks into someone's house, and forcibly jails him for one of these non-crimes, the police officer is guilty of assault and kidnapping. As soon as a jury finds him guilty of this non-crime, every juror is guilty of conspiracy to commit kidnapping. As soon as a judge sentences this person, (s)he too is guilty of conspiracy to commit kidnapping. Since they directed the police and courts to commit these crimes, every legislator who voted for the relevant drug law is guilty of conspiracy to commit mass assault and kidnapping. They are all dangerous felons (except the drug user and seller). Their hate has ruined the lives of millions of peaceful Americans. I am not suggesting that it is a good idea to abuse psychoactive substances. My experience tells me otherwise, in no uncertain terms. But the natural consequences of drug abuse are punishment enough. There is no need to compound personal stupidity with mass societal insanity. End the drug war now. End the hate before America follows Germany's disastrous example of where mass hatred inevitably leads. * * * * * * * * * * * Note for non New Yorkers - New York's legislature has two houses, the senate and the assembly. The speaker of the assembly is Sheldon Silver. The temporary president and majority leader of the senate is Joseph L. Bruno. From what I hear on the radio, Mr. Bruno runs the senate, and, even more so, Mr. Silver runs the assembly. New York state law is effectively made by three men, Mr. Silver, Mr. Bruno, and the governor, George Pataki. But this is only what I hear on the radio. I have never visited either house or met any senator or assembly member.
Bill St. Clair writes software, mostly Java and Progress these days. He authors a weblog, titled End the War on Freedom. add new comment | quote | 1076 reads
Reply |
BlogrollLewRockwell.comQuotesEvery man, woman, and responsible child has an unalienable individual, civil, Constitutional, and human right to obtain, own, and carry, openly or concealed, any weapon -- rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- any time, any place, without asking anyone's permission. -- L. Neil Smith Reread that pesky first clause of the Second Amendment. It doesn't say what any of us thought it said. What it says is that infringing the right of the people to keep and bear arms is treason. What else do you call an act that endangers "the security of a free state"? And if it's treason, then it's punishable by death. I suggest due process, speedy trials, and public hangings. -- L. Neil Smith Based on 253 journal articles, 99 books, 43 government publications, and some of its own empirical work, the panel couldn't identify a single gun control regulation that reduced violent crime, suicide or accidents. -- John Lott, commenting on the National Academy of Sciences report (PDF) on gun control laws Zero Aggression Principle ("Zap") "A libertarian is a person who believes that no one has the right, under any circumstances, to initiate force against another human being, or to advocate or delegate its initiation. Those who act consistently with this principle are libertarians, whether they realize it or not. Those who fail to act consistently with it are not libertarians, regardless of what they may claim." -- L. Neil Smith Formerly called the "Non-Aggression Principle", or "NAP" Why Did It Have to be... Guns? Make no mistake: all politicians -- even those ostensibly on the side of guns and gun ownership -- hate the issue and anyone, like me, who insists on bringing it up. They hate it because it's an X-ray machine. It's a Vulcan mind-meld. It's the ultimate test to which any politician -- or political philosophy -- can be put. If a politician isn't perfectly comfortable with the idea of his average constituent, any man, woman, or responsible child, walking into a hardware store and paying cash -- for any rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- without producing ID or signing one scrap of paper, he isn't your friend no matter what he tells you. If he isn't genuinely enthusiastic about his average constituent stuffing that weapon into a purse or pocket or tucking it under a coat and walking home without asking anybody's permission, he's a four-flusher, no matter what he claims. What his attitude -- toward your ownership and use of weapons -- conveys is his real attitude about you. And if he doesn't trust you, then why in the name of John Moses Browning should you trust him? -- L. Neil Smith "Tell me," I was once asked, "What do you think about gun control? Give me the short answer." To which I replied, "If you try to take our firearms we will kill you." -- Mike Vanderboegh The state can only survive as long as a majority is programmed to believe that theft isn't wrong if it's called taxation or asset forfeiture or eminent domain, that assault and kidnapping isn't wrong if it's called arrest, that mass murder isn't wrong if it's called war. -- Bill St. Clair Monthly ArchivesTTLB |
Recent comments
2 hours 42 min ago
10 hours 22 min ago
16 hours 44 min ago
3 days 11 hours ago
4 days 6 hours ago
4 days 16 hours ago
5 days 6 hours ago
5 days 8 hours ago
6 days 1 hour ago
6 days 2 hours ago