NavigationBanners
Active forum topicsRecent blog postsUser loginWho's new
Who's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 1209 guests online.
|
Add new commentInterdiction InsanitySubmitted by Bill St. Clair on Fri, 2003-01-31 03:25.
[A letter to the editor in response to an op-ed in the
Berkshire Eagle]
The September 9 issue contained a column by Ronald Brownstein, "Bush-Fox lead assault on cartels". Insanity is characterized as doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. Hence, attempting to beat the drug cartels by more and more interdiction is plainly insane. Making it harder to grow and distribute drugs does nothing but raise the price. This pours even more money into the cartels' pockets, and corrupts even more police, both Mexican and American. Mexico's new president, Vincente Fox, knows this. He is on record as saying that drugs should and will be legalized. He's only working with the anti-drug crazies because until then it's politically expedient to do so. Legalize drugs and the cartels will disappear overnight. Without the cash cow of black market drug sales, they will be left with no way to fund their operations. Legalize marijuana, cocaine, heroin, methamphetamine, ecstasy, the whole ball of wax. If you're still suffering from an addiction to controlling other people's lives, regulate and tax them like alcohol. Turn your attention to providing realistic information to prevent drug abuse and voluntary treatment options to help cure it. Adults own their bodies. What they choose to ingest is nobody's business. Laws criminalizing the possession/sale of vegetable extracts by/to peaceful adults are an abomination. They have no place in a free country.
Bill St. Clair add new comment | quote | 981 reads
Reply |
BlogrollFirearm NewsQuotesEvery man, woman, and responsible child has an unalienable individual, civil, Constitutional, and human right to obtain, own, and carry, openly or concealed, any weapon -- rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- any time, any place, without asking anyone's permission. -- L. Neil Smith Reread that pesky first clause of the Second Amendment. It doesn't say what any of us thought it said. What it says is that infringing the right of the people to keep and bear arms is treason. What else do you call an act that endangers "the security of a free state"? And if it's treason, then it's punishable by death. I suggest due process, speedy trials, and public hangings. -- L. Neil Smith Based on 253 journal articles, 99 books, 43 government publications, and some of its own empirical work, the panel couldn't identify a single gun control regulation that reduced violent crime, suicide or accidents. -- John Lott, commenting on the National Academy of Sciences report (PDF) on gun control laws Zero Aggression Principle ("Zap") "A libertarian is a person who believes that no one has the right, under any circumstances, to initiate force against another human being, or to advocate or delegate its initiation. Those who act consistently with this principle are libertarians, whether they realize it or not. Those who fail to act consistently with it are not libertarians, regardless of what they may claim." -- L. Neil Smith Formerly called the "Non-Aggression Principle", or "NAP" Why Did It Have to be... Guns? Make no mistake: all politicians -- even those ostensibly on the side of guns and gun ownership -- hate the issue and anyone, like me, who insists on bringing it up. They hate it because it's an X-ray machine. It's a Vulcan mind-meld. It's the ultimate test to which any politician -- or political philosophy -- can be put. If a politician isn't perfectly comfortable with the idea of his average constituent, any man, woman, or responsible child, walking into a hardware store and paying cash -- for any rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- without producing ID or signing one scrap of paper, he isn't your friend no matter what he tells you. If he isn't genuinely enthusiastic about his average constituent stuffing that weapon into a purse or pocket or tucking it under a coat and walking home without asking anybody's permission, he's a four-flusher, no matter what he claims. What his attitude -- toward your ownership and use of weapons -- conveys is his real attitude about you. And if he doesn't trust you, then why in the name of John Moses Browning should you trust him? -- L. Neil Smith The state can only survive as long as a majority is programmed to believe that theft isn't wrong if it's called taxation or asset forfeiture or eminent domain, that assault and kidnapping isn't wrong if it's called arrest, that mass murder isn't wrong if it's called war. -- Bill St. Clair Monthly ArchivesTTLB |
Recent comments
5 hours 29 sec ago
2 days 3 hours ago
1 week 1 day ago
1 week 2 days ago
1 week 2 days ago
1 week 6 days ago
2 weeks 3 days ago
2 weeks 3 days ago
2 weeks 5 days ago
2 weeks 5 days ago