The Gun Blogs
September 1, 2008
09:44
Governor Palin;
Welcome to the Presidential Campaign! Your staunch Conservatism and record of reform are what America has been waiting for.
The paper-clip chains of bureaucracy that have bound down the sleeping giant of the Second Amendment must be swept aside. The fundamental Human rights that are recognized by the Bill of Rights apply to all Americans, whether they live in Montana or Massachusetts. All Americans have the right to be secure in their homes and their persons from the tyranny of petty criminals and petty officials. We look to you to incorporate their self-evident truths into the upcoming Administration.
As you have cleaned house in Alaska we need you in Washington to clear away the fiefdoms and empires of the barnacle bureaucracy that are strangling our country.
Please know that you have our support as you struggle past the viscous attacks that have already begun upon you and your family. Having nothing of substance with which to fight your opponents are hoping to sap your will to win. From what I have read, I almost have pity on them.
August 30, 2008
11:50
I reviewed the SOCOM "Scout Squad" rifle against Colonel Coopers Scout Rifle requirements
Here.
Enjoy!
August 29, 2008
21:31
I have aquired a Durs Egg 50 caliber flint lock pocket or muff pistol. It has a 2 3/4 inch screw off cannon barrell. It has a fold up hide a way trigger and a safety. The pistol grip is a one piece checkered wood with what looks to be silver inlay on the backstrap, sides and bottom of grip. The bottom of the grip is in the shape of an egg. It has engraving on both sides. Left side says London and the right side says DE GG. There is no bluing on the gun. All parts on the gun appear to be in good mechanical condition and it still looks all original with no replaced parts. I have never seen a picture of the gun, but the gun itself seems to be in very good shape. I can use any help at all in identifying the gun and getting an approximate value that anyone might have...here are a few photos..thanks in advance for your help
August 27, 2008
04:24
It is a well known fact that women feel reluctant to own guns. Well not all of them I know several women who own a gun and know how to use it. I however keep hearing women express the desire not to hear and see guns ever.
I guess it is somewhat natural but if we think of the number of attacks that are made on women I would really suggest women to open their eyes and be aware of the fact that having a gun would help them a lot in their ability to protect themselves.
I suppose part of the reluctance of women to own a gun and learn how to use it still comes from the expectation that they would always have a man that comes to their rescue.
The mademoiselle in distress and the man that comes to save her is a well known dream of many men and women and has been for many many years.
The truth is that in a world that is supposed to balance the roles of men and women, hanging on to the fantasy is really a bad idea.
As more women stop expecting the privilege to live in some romantic fantasy the rate of crimes against women would decrease.
Being victims is usually a matter of a state of mind and is the other side of the expectation that a charming savior would come rescue her and they'll live happily ever after.
Owning a gun and learning how to use it is an important step in growing up for many women. There is no reason why women won't try to defend themselves the way men do. The only reason is the cultural archaic assumption that being weak is a desirable, adorable characteristic. One that would allow for true love.
There is a lot to analyze and discuss on the issue of gender relations and preconditioning the influence they have on the attitudes to the issue of gun ownership and rights. But the most important thing is to realize that the desire to be saved, rescued and to feel safe by the man in our lives means also that we agree to be weak and victims.
Women the fantasy doesn't worth it. Allow yourself to be responsible on your own safety and you'll find that your partner in life can be much more than a savior. He can be a real friend.
For more posts check my blog here
August 25, 2008
12:35
Been shopping for ammo. I have a good supply laid in, but you can never have enough. Anybody know a good source for surplus .308 and .45ACP?
Also just to stir up some conversation, what is your SHTF gun or guns? Mine is a Socom16 and SA 1911 Mil-Spec. They always go bang when I pull the trigger and pack enough punch. Reliabilty equals confidence when it comes to guns and I'm very confident in my choices.
Molon Labe!
August 22, 2008
11:08
Seattle group is official. We met Aug. 9th. The name of the group is now: Citizens For The 2nd Amendment. It has gone well and we have a few new members. Also did an interview with Aimee Curl of Seattle Weekly about the group. RTKBA web site has been real helpful and supportive and we have our own forum there. The director of Washington Collector Arms has graciously offered publicity in their magazine which is fantastic. We even have a lawyer in the group as well an an owner of a computer consulting company and a manager from an eastside computer corporation. Once again we are not out to intimidate anyone or shove anything down anyone's throat the government does enough of that. We are just trying to show people that we are just Americans exercising our rights and protecting that which is granted to us under the constitution. Side note: Aimee Curl will be joining us at our next meeting to talk to everyone and it should be a great time. Once again everyone is invited to come or join. Doesn't make any difference weather you are republican or democrat or whatever. I am not either I am an American. I stand up for all people and all rights. Will update as things are happening real fast with this group. If you want any further info. e-mail me at redboneshadow@yahoo.com
Respectfully
Michael Cheney
August 5, 2008
14:50
The NRA has already sounded the alert about Barack Obama. It would seem, though, that many gun owners think the NRA is just engaging in scare tactics. Obama is polling well in heavily pro-gun states.
This is the same Barack Obama who voted for Ted Kennedy's ammunition ban. The same Obama who voted for a ban on handguns. The same candidate who supported the DC gun ban.
The problem is that he's been on so many sides of gun issues that he's managed to convince many gun owners that he's not a threat to them.
If you think that's not possible, consider Wisconsin in 2002. Then-attorney general Jim Doyle was running for governor. For twelve years as attorney general he proposed bans on short-barreled handguns, bans on shotguns, and even helped a state senator draft a bill that would have banned all ammunition except that specifically designed for single-shot firearms (meaning that all ammunition would have been banned).
The NRA sounded the alarm, but all Doyle had to do was send a mailing directed at gun owners to union members. The mailing assured that Doyle supported the rights of hunters and sportsmen. That was it. That was all he needed to do. Despite the fact that Wisconsin has one of the highest percentages of NRA members of any state in the country, Doyle won.
If it can happen in Wisconsin, it can certainly happen in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Virginia, and just about every other pro-gun state.
This will likely be a bad year for Republicans. And, if Obama is elected, we can expect all sorts of new anti-gun legislation, from a new ban on Evil Black Rifles to a ban on private gun sales, and more. And we just might see enough gutless Republicans cave on these issues that the bills make it to Obama's desk.
Even more important is the Supreme Court. The next president will appoint as many as three new justices. The Heller case hung on a string, with Justice Kennedy being the swing vote. That means that four justices were willing to rewrite the Constitution to suit their political philosophies.
Barack Obama isn't just a threat to those who like AR's or AK's. He's a threat to anyone who values the right to keep and bear arms for any purpose.
What happened in 2002 with the governor's election here in Wisconsin can happen with the presidential election if gun owners don't unite.
God help us if we don't.
Dick
rangefinders
lasers
scopes
August 3, 2008
09:20
A meet and greet is planned Aug 9th at 10 am at Randy's restaurant at 10016 E. Marginal way so. Seattle Located at the south end of Boeing field on Marginal way. It is open to all interested parties. I need strong leaders to help spearhead this new project and a first for Seattle. Come have breakfast and discuss the future of this group. Any questions or for further information just call me at 207-722-5398 or e-mail me at redboneshadow@yahoo.com
July 31, 2008
20:11
My interview with the Greeneville Sun newspaper.
http://greenevillesun.com/story/296778/1
July 27, 2008
01:50
I am running for the United States Senate because right now of all the laws passed in Washington DC last year. Only one in 100,000 was passed by Congress if that many.
All the other laws disguised as rules, regulations, codes, guidelines and standards were written by non elected bureaucrats. Writing for agencies attached to the executive branch of government.
To put it to you bluntly.
The Executive branch of government is making 999,000 laws for every one legitimately passed by Congress.
If you don’t believe this. Every time you see a business, businessman or individual being fined or prosecuted for violating an EPA – OSHA – FDA – FCC etc. etc. etc. rule or regulation.
You begin to realize that these rules, regulations, codes, guidelines and standards are made by bureaucrats in the executive branch of government. Not Congress.
Go to any law school library and ask the librarian to show you the EPA, FCC, OSHA regulations. The volumes will cover an entire wall. With the hundreds and thousands of sections and subsections – sub-sub-sections etc.
All of which are laws. None of which were passed by the Congress!
All of these agencies are part of the executive branch of government.
James Madison’s writings ought to be evident too everybody.
“The accumulation of all power legislative, judicial, executive in the same hands. Whether of one a few or many. Where self appointed heredity or elected.
May justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.”
(FYI: Tyranny which is the arbitrary use of government power is the opposite of liberty. Just as freedom is the opposite of slavery)
We are every day loosing more and more of our liberty to an ever increasing more and more powerful Federal bureaucracy.
I am running for the United States Senate to put a stop to this.
July 23, 2008
14:09
Prior to this election in general. When a debate was over between the candidates in a public forum.
A few people in the audience had the pleasure of asking one or two questions.
All that has changed:
There is a great fear that somebody in the audience will ask “If this program is put in will it increase the size, cost, reach or power of government?”
This question strikes fear in the hearts of practically all of the candidates whether they are masquerading as democrats or republicans. For these candidates know that the solutions they are offering do increase the Size, Cost, Reach and Power of government.
And they are deathly afraid that the public will discover what they (handpicked democrats and republicans)
have been doing for the past 75 years!
Hence – in case you haven’t noticed - NO questions are being taken from the audience! Thus preventing an ordinary person from asking the most vital question ever asked.
“Will this increase the Size, Cost, Reach or Power of government?”
Just thought you’d like to know.
14:09
Prior to this election in general. When a debate was over between the candidates in a public forum.
A few people in the audience had the pleasure of asking one or two questions.
All that has changed:
There is a great fear that somebody in the audience will ask “If this program is put in will it increase the size, cost, reach or power of government?”
This question strikes fear in the hearts of practically all of the candidates whether they are masquerading as democrats or republicans. For these candidates know that the solutions they are offering do increase the Size, Cost, Reach and Power of government.
And they are deathly afraid that the public will discover what they (handpicked democrats and republicans)
have been doing for the past 75 years!
Hence – in case you haven’t noticed - NO questions are being taken from the audience! Thus preventing an ordinary person from asking the most vital question ever asked.
“Will this increase the Size, Cost, Reach or Power of government?”
Just thought you’d like to know.
July 13, 2008
July 10, 2008
13:17
Or is it already lost? I dont no about you but It seems I ask myself That question in one way or another every day. Weather it from something I see or from something thats said. For example,I was in the Marine recruting station the other day,looking for an old friend who is still in active duty.The recruter gave my 9 year old son a hat that said MARENES in the front of it.I thought it was a kind jesture being that I had paid for it anyway. This hat was very nice so we took the hat home and I began to take a closer look at this hat. Underneath this hat I looked at the tag witch was facing a downward position and I new what it was going to say but I couldnt bring myself to turn the tag over for fear of what I was going to see. I just couldnt affiliate something as strong and fearless as the United States Marine with some one who hated freedom. But reluctantly i gave in to my own curiosity and looked. Suprisingly I didnt immidiatly turn to salt but unfortunitly it read what my own fears had spoken, MADE IN CHINA. "What is this country comming to" is not a phraes that I use any more." What has this country become" Have we lost who we are? What would our founding fathers say? I dont know about you but every day of my life, I strive to make my parents proud of me in every thing I do. I have to, I owe it to them for what they have done for me. Do we not owe the same to our founding fathers the same gratitude or should we squander over the lowest bidder on a simple hat. Life is a gift as is freedom that is given by the creator and it is my rite to be free to do whatever I damn well please, but it is my duty and obligation to honor those who fought and died to provide these things to me. Who is the American who says enough is enough? Who will draw a line in the sand? Wile every day tiny little peices of who we are are picked away like the hat that belongs to my son. And befor you know it there will be nothing left. We will be left for the taking or have we been taken already. What do you believe?
July 7, 2008
20:29
My husband has been on me for a long time (read: years) to start shooting. He's insisted that I just learn the basic rules of gun safety and how to use one "just in case." Sounds reasonable, but I kept putting off his request. I would make a trip here and there with him to a range or an event, but I always turned my nose up for some reason or another.
A few months ago the bug finally bit me and I love it! My husband was thrilled and bought me a Glock 17. I decided to blog about my entry into the gun culture and start shooting IDPA competitively (wow, I suck).
You can check out my blog at www.prettypistolera.com
I would love to hear any feedback or advice... please help the girl out!
UPDATE 7.9.08: The feeds to the Pretty Pistolera blog are now up and running. Thanks to Sailorcurt and Steve for the heads-up :)
July 3, 2008
18:09
With the mayor of Seattle trying to ban all guns on city property, I am starting a gun rights/concealed carry group here in Seattle. Looking for people who want to stand up for their rights. I plan on doing trips to different ranges as a group, Council meetings, fund raisers and other activities as a group to show that we are not the same as criminals. Not limited to Seattle but surrounding areas as well. There is no organized group here and if we don't stand up for our rights they will take them away. Anyone interested in joining me let me know. Redboneshadow@yahoo.com
18:07
With the mayor of Seattle trying to ban all guns on city property, I am starting a gun rights/concealed carry group here in Seattle. Looking for people who want to stand up for their rights. I plan on doing trips to different ranges as a group, Council meetings, fund raisers and other activities as a group to show that we are not the same as criminals. Not limited to Seattle but surrounding areas as well. There is no organized group here and if we don't stand up for our rights they will take them away. Anyone interested in joining me let me know. Redboneshadow@yahoo.com
June 30, 2008
13:37
6/30/08
Significance of the “Heller” ruling.
The purpose of the “Heller vs. DC” ruling is this. To establish the supremacy of the Supreme Court on all things Constitutional.
Essentially this ruling makes the words in the Constitution meaningless.
The only thing that counts is what the Supreme Court says it says.
Consider this:
Article One: “All power belongs to the Supreme X”
Article Two:
Article Three:
Article Four:
Article Five:
If you want to know what these articles say you must have the people in article one tell you. Which means what is written is meaningless? Except for the meaning given to it by the Supreme X. Even when the Supreme X is saying the opposite of what is written.
Haven’t you noticed that not a peep has been heard from the ACLU?
This ruling has been called a “Landmark” decision. What is a “Landmark?”
This is a decision that destroys a section of the Constitution.
A “Landmark” is a message to the liberals to shut up.
This decision establishes the authority of the Supreme Court to say what anything in the constitution means independent of and contrary to written word and common understanding.
That is why it’s called a Landmark decision. And in no way is that decision a victory for anybody except the communists, fascists, and socialists pretending to a world wide throne.
Please read the Soviet Constitution. http://www.marxists.org/history/ussr/government/constitution/1918/article1.htm
“All the central and local power belongs to these Soviets”
A “Soviet” is a committee.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_(council)
That committee governs’ a particular section of life. If all power belongs to the Soviet then what ever comes after that means nothing.
Take for example the “Frankfurter Doctrine.”
It basically says that the Constitution of the United States of America is whatever the Supreme Court says it says. Take another look at the Soviet Constitution.
The solution for this and all our problems is to elect ordinary people to the House of Representatives who will VOTE NO on any bill that expands the size, cost, extends the reach or increases the power of the government!
June 29, 2008
07:57
* Terrorism
* The Economy
* Price of fuel
* The growth in government
* Presidential electon
07:49
The Purpose Of The Second Amendment
Question
Why was the Second Amendment put into the Constitution?
Answer
So that we could protect ourselves from the government!
Other measures to protect US from the government were:
1) The fedgov could have no army in peacetime.
2) Fedgov could not quarter troops in our houses
3) Fedgov could send troops into a state only with the consent of the state government or during an insurrection.
Question
Without an army how could the federal government defend the country against invasion and war?
Answer
By calling out the militia: Each state had an organized militia under the control of the state government (the officers were trained by the federal government).
Question
What was to prevent the state government from using the militia against its own citizens?
Answer
To regulate that is to control the militia the Founder’s said “Arm the entire population”
THAT is the Second Amendment.
In the “Federalist Papers” the founders asserted that the combined militias of the states would be stronger than any force the Federal Government could raise, and by the same reasoning an armed population would be stronger than any militia a State Government could use against its citizens.
The Second Amendment has nothing whatsoever to do with hunting, sportsmanship or target shooting:
The claim that it does has been made by people who want to exclude the ordinary citizens.
(Who are not hunters, sportsmen or target shooters) from the debate.
This allows those promoters to agree to a series of compromises which over time will disarm the people and leave US at the mercy of the government.
If you are a gun owner in America.
Vote for Leonard “ Lenny” Ladner for United States Senate.
Please visit me on the web at www.Ladner4USSENATE.com.
I would appreciate it if you could duplicate this message.
|
Recent comments
9 hours 11 min ago
1 day 23 hours ago
5 days 10 hours ago
5 days 11 hours ago
6 days 9 hours ago
1 week 36 min ago
1 week 1 day ago
1 week 3 days ago
1 week 4 days ago
1 week 4 days ago